The Patriots...news from the citizen advocates
Blog Photos Syndicate Search  
Topics
2nd Amendment
Armed Forces
Education
Energy
Entertainment
Environment/Recycling
Finance
Immigration/Border
Law
News
Opinion
Pharmacy/Medicine
Politics
Religion/values
Taxes
Transportation
My Photos
2007 News Archives
2007 Politoons
2008 News Archives
2008 Politoons
2009 Politoons
Streetcars
Members
Sign In

Entries in "Pharmacy/Medicine"
<< < | 1 2
Father: 'System' killing my disabled daughter
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Published: Jul.26.2008 @ 7:40 am | Last edited: Dec.01.2008 @ 9:15 pm




The father of a disabled Delaware woman who recently earned the support of state lawmakers says the system – of courts, lawyers, hospitals and disability agencies – literally is combining to bring about the death of his daughter.

"The court system should not have the right to impose this kind of treatment on a mentally disabled person," Randy Richardson told WND today. His daughter, Lauren Richardson, has been disabled since an apparent drug overdose nearly two years ago.

Judie Brown of the American Life League recently issued a call to those who are concerned about such cases to help.

"The governor of Delaware, Ruth Ann Minner, is being asked by pro-life Americans across this nation to intervene in this case in order to save Lauren from what many fear is an imminent court order dictating that Lauren be starved and dehydrated to death," she wrote. "I am asking you to be one of those who communicates your passionate belief that Lauren's life is sacred and deserves to be protected from those who would order her death. The governor's e-mail address is governor.minner@state.de.us."

Brown said "it has been a source of ongoing sadness to read of the difficulties Lauren Richardson's father has had over the course of the past several months.

"For those of you who are not familiar with her case, Lauren overdosed on heroin on August 28, 2006. She suffered oxygen deprivation as a result of the overdose and Lauren is now ... unable to speak out for herself. At the time of the overdose Lauren was expecting a baby. Her parents honored what they knew would have been her wish and did all they could to keep her healthy and comfortable until the child was born. Today, though Lauren may not be aware of it, she is the mother of Ember Grace, who was born in February 2007," Brown wrote.

Lauren's case has been compared to that of Terri Schiavo, the Florida woman who died after courts ruled doctors could follow her husband's orders to deprive her of food and water until she died.

The Schiavo case, on which WND has reported exhaustively since 2002 – far longer than most other national news organization – ended in March 2005 when she died, despite a battle by her parents who wanted to care for her to overturn a court order allowing the removal of her feeding tube.

Randy Richardson says he now is battling his former wife, the medical establishment and the court system for the life of his daughter.

He told WND that the courts in Delaware are considering whether to designate that Lauren is in a persistent vegetative state, even though, "We've had doctors look at her … There are possibilities with treatments. But she's not getting treatments."

"The state does not allow this for prisoners. If they had treated a dog this way, they would be doing jail time," he told WND. "With therapy, she might be eating [by herself] within a couple months," he said. "Right now they're trying to hang her out to dry."

He said he's identified treatments that could be tried and therapy that could be attempted, and he's offered to provide the care his daughter needs, but has been rejected.

"My daughter has been there for 16 months. I've had enough," he said. "I'm really ticked about it. This Medicaid thing is paying huge numbers to keep her in this home when she could be at my home for nothing."  Even now, without substantive treatment, he said, "She has been trying to sit up and also has tried to verbalize. She looks good, is loving, she cries, she can giggle, she can't talk but does try to verbalize, we can tell when she's in pain or uncomfortable."

He previously posted a YouTube video of her, which can be seen here:

But he told WND the court-appointed lawyers have now banned him from showing any pictures or videos which reflect Lauren's condition.

He said he and Lauren's mother, from whom he is divorced, worked together following Lauren's accident to make sure her care was provided until her baby was born. Then Randy Richardson got a letter from his ex-wife's lawyer telling him the goal would be to "permit Lauren's starvation," according to Brown.

At LifeForLauren.org Lauren's father confirmed, "We struggle at times as we seek to share with the public the details of what is happening with Lauren because of the disagreement we have with Lauren's mother. We cannot understand her reasoning in refusing a path of hope, healing and restoration for Lauren and insisting on causing her death by withholding food and water from her. The issue in Lauren's case is the eternal truth that all people, no matter what their medical condition, bear the image of God and deserve basic care and an opportunity to be restored to health."

The statement from the House of Representatives said:

BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the 144th General Assembly of the State of Delaware that it is against the public policy of this State and this State's interest in life, health and safety, for hydration and nutrition that is not harming a patient to be involuntarily removed from a non-terminal, apparently brain-incapacitated patient if doing so will cause the individual's death. Furthermore, such withholding of hydration and nutrition without: 1) clear written direction from a legally competent patient or, 2) a valid written advance health-care directive that was previously executed by a patient who is now incapacitated and that either allows such withholding under such circumstances or grants an agent authority to make that decision by an incapacitated patient is also against the public policy of the State of Delaware. The lawmakers' plan cites the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which "asserts that 'everyone has the right to recognition as a person before the law' and that 'all are equal before the law.'"

They also cite the Americans with Disabilities Act that "clearly identifies the rights of the disabled to access essential needs and have essential services provided to them."

Further, they affirm, "it is becoming increasingly apparent that persons who are suffering from severe brain injuries often have cognitive functions significantly beyond what medical science previously estimated."

Finally, they determine, "it is also becoming increasingly apparently that the diagnosis of 'persistent vegetative state' or 'PVS' is a category that recent science shows is far more uncertain and overly broad than had been previously thought, including a high rate of misdiagnoses of PVS patients who have not been able to exhibit responses, but whose consciousness can now sometimes be measured."

In an explanatory note accompany the resolution, the lawmakers said: "This Resolution establishes protections for mentally disabled individuals in the State of Delaware. The impetus for this Resolution comes from the case of Lauren Richardson, a 24-year-old Delaware woman who, after suffering brain injuries and impaired consciousness, now faces the possible removal of her nutrition and hydration, despite the absence of her clearly specified and legal consent to any such a course of action. The State of Delaware has, through recent legislation prompted by the abuses at the Delaware Psychiatric Center, endeavored to protect the rights of mentally disabled patients in the First State. Lauren, as a mentally disabled person, is enumerated those same protection and rights."

A priest who was with Terri Schiavo during her final hours in this life later told WND society has it all wrong – because it does not understand the difference between a futile treatment and a futile life.

Father Frank Pavone, of Priests for Life, said even healthy people, if brain-injured, are in danger under the current precedent of cases.

"Terry left no indication that she wanted to be deprived of food and water. Yet the courts insisted that this happen. Nor was Terri lacking a family ready to care for her, without complaint. Yet they were not allowed to," he said. "Many people fear that they will be given all kinds of machines and medicines against their will," Pavone told WND. "What they should fear is exactly the opposite, namely, that even when they indicate that they want appropriate treatments, these will be denied them."

A Delaware court in January awarded guardianship of Lauren Richardson to her mother, Edith Towers, who has told reporters her daughter would want artificial life support ended.

Parents, Pharmacists and
Physicians Beware of Pentacel
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Published: Jul.17.2008 @ 1:09 pm | Last edited: Dec.01.2008 @ 9:22 pm

by Pharmacists for Life International

 

A July 17 article picked up by AP is touting Sanofi Pasteur's new Pentacel vaccine as a vaccine that will reduce the number of shots children receive. In fact, this is not true for most children who are already being vaccinated with Glaxo SmithKline's Pediarix, another 5-in-1 vaccine that has been widely used in the US for over 5 years.  

The difference between the two is that Pentacel includes DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), polio and HiB.

Pediarix includes DTaP, polio and hepatitis-B. Either shot would require an additional 3 injections of either Hepatitis-B or HiB.  And while Pentacel is given in 4 doses; Pediarix requires only 3 doses.  Pentacel also requires reconstitution from 2 separate vials prior to administration, while Pediarix comes ready to be used, making it less cumbersome and safer to use.  Either vaccine can be given from 6wks of age to 18 mos.  But the greatest disparity between the two vaccines is that Pentacel uses aborted fetal cell line MRC-5 in its polio version, while Pediarix uses Vero cell lines, making it the vaccine of choice for prolife families and physicians.  Sanofi chose to market their aborted fetal version in the US after Canadian Physicians for Life successfully lobbied Health Canada for access to the ethically produced version in 2006 and stopped using Pentacel.

In addition, the Centers for Disease Control and the FDA withdrew the Sanofi "tainted" version of polio (Poliovax) from distribution in the US in early 2000.  The only separate dose of the polio vaccine (IPOL) that is given in the US uses Vero cell lines - not aborted fetal cell lines.

Clearly, the only reason for the ACIP recommendation of Pentacel appears to be a financial plug for Pentacel's lagging sales. Concerned parents and physicians beware: Pediarix is the ethical version - and it does mean less shots for children.

 

 

Homeless people die after bird flu
vaccine trial in Poland
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Published: Jul.07.2008 @ 8:00 am | Last edited: Dec.01.2008 @ 9:24 pm

 By Matthew Day

{Warsaw} Three Polish doctors and six nurses are facing criminal prosecution after a number of homeless people died following medical trials for a vaccine to the H5N1 bird-flu virus. 21 people died after being given the vaccine.

The medical staff, from the northern town of Grudziadz, are being investigated over medical trials on as many as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors say involved an untried vaccine to the highly-contagious virus. Authorities claim that the alleged victims received £1-2 to be tested with what they thought was a conventional flu vaccine but, according to investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.

The director of a Grudziadz homeless centre, Mieczyslaw Waclawski, told a Polish newspaper that last year, 21 people from his centre died, a figure well above the average of about eight. Although authorities have yet to prove a direct link between the deaths and the activities of the medical staff, Poland's health minister, Ewa Kopacz, has said that the doctors and nurses involved should not return to their profession. "It is in the interests of all doctors that those who are responsible for this are punished," the minister added.

Investigators are also probing the possibility that the medical staff may have also have deceived the pharmaceutical companies that commissioned the trials. The suspects said that the all those involved knew that the trial involved an anti-H5N1 drug and willingly participated. 

The news of the investigation will come as another blow to the reputation of Poland's beleaguered and poverty-stricken national health service.  In 2002, a number of ambulance medics were found guilty of killing their patients for commissions from funeral companies.

AMA Attacks Pro-Life Pharmacies
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Published: Jun.17.2008 @ 8:07 am | Last edited: Dec.01.2008 @ 9:32 pm
by PFLI International 

Washington, DC 
– The American Medical Association attacked pharmacists’ right to refuse to dispense contraceptives, including those which may cause abortion, at its June 11-14 Board of Trustees’ annual meeting.

The AMA‘s Board of Trustees told members that: "AMA supports legislation that would require individual pharmacists and pharmacy chains to fill legally valid prescriptions or to provide immediate referral to an appropriate alternative dispensing pharmacy without interference."

It further stated the following: "A pharmacist's deliberate refusal to dispense a drug on religious, moral, or ethical grounds, i.e., pharmacist conscientious objection, has been most often associated with Plan B, the emergency contraceptive, and has received considerable attention in both the lay media and in medical journal commentaries. Of all of the reasons why a pharmacist might not dispense a legally valid prescription, conscientious objection is the only one that places a pharmacist's personal views in potential conflict with the best interests of the patient."
 
The Washington Post reports that the policies of pharmacies such as DMC, "have left women traumatized and resulted in pharmacists being fired, fined or reprimanded." "The pharmacy is one of a small but growing number of drugstores around the country that have become the latest front in a conflict pitting patients' rights against those of health-care workers who assert a "right of conscience" to refuse to provide care or products that they find objectionable," the Post story says.

"The DMC Pharmacy has every right to refuse to aid in the destruction of human beings," said American Life League’s president, Judie Brown. "The recent attacks on pharmacists who are committed to saving lives and not destroying them serves to illustrate the role the AMA and the mainstream media play in the culture of death."

"This is just the latest in a well-orchestrated series of attacks on the freedom of conscience of medical professionals,"  a press release issued by American Life League associate group Pharmacists for Life stated.

 


Current Page 2
<< < | 1 2

   
| Report Member | Free Blog BlogText.org