Anak Malaysia
Blog Subscribe Syndicate Search Contact Me  
Topics
ASEAN
Disgusting reports
Education
Environment
Esperanto
info in Bahasa Melayu
info in Chinese
info in English
Komen-komen
Link
Mind our English
Politics
Rojak issues
Sayang-sayang
Strictly Malaysia
Trade
Members
Sign In

Blog - Latest Entries
<< < | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | > >>
info in Chinese > 中国足球流氓的职业轨迹
5 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.18.2006 @ 9:43 pm

 

中国足球流氓的职业轨迹 
◇字体:[ ]  发表评论 来源:北京科技报(06/06/07 01:49) 

石岩:国家社会科学基金球场暴力项目负责人

球迷很容易相互感染 

法国世界杯上的德国足球流氓

英国和德国足球流氓街头上演“全武行”

足球场上的流氓行为

足球暴力的诡异神经回路

  以制造事端为职业和精神追求———

  中国有没有足球流氓

  对于“足球流氓”的争议

  世界杯开幕在即,安全问题成为头等大事。为了防范来自英国,东道主德国的那些臭名昭著的足球流氓兴风作浪,主办国如临大敌。

  世界杯开幕前夕,记者采访了曾经担任2002年度国家社会科学基金青年研究项目《球场暴力的发展趋势、研究进展与遏制策略》的主持人石岩教授。他语出惊人:“虽然足球流氓在欧美已经广为人知,但是国内一直十分忌讳。事实上,根据我们所做的研究,中国也已经有了足球流氓!”

  石岩介绍,2000年公安部和中国足协负责人首次公开承认中国足球观众中也有足球流氓,虽然他们是极少数,但是危害特别大。然而国内一些人认为,在中国还没有像英国那样所谓的“职业足球流氓”,我国不存在足球流氓。

  描述球迷暴力行为的词汇很多,但是在如何定性发生的球迷暴力行为问题上有一些分歧。2002年3月24日西安球迷闹事后,一些媒体认为“球迷骚乱”,是“足球流氓”所为。但是,西安赛区负责人认为,这只是少数球迷滋事,并非“球迷骚乱”,更不能称那些闹事球迷是“足球流氓”。中国足协现在给这类事件定性时使用“球迷过激行为”这样的词汇,比以往谨慎用词了。

  石岩:“有一种说法是,过去我国没有球场暴力,现在出现球迷闹事事件,主要是看到国外经常发生的球迷闹事报道后模仿学来的。事实上,这种舶来品的说法是值得商榷的。在我国,球场观众暴力一直存在,只不过以往的危害程度不大,并没有引起人们的注意罢了。”

  逐步增加的足球暴力事件

  石岩介绍,我国出现最早的球场观众暴力事件是1982年10月重庆发生的球迷骚乱事件。

  1985年我国足坛相继发生两件大事,即北京的“5·19”事件和沈阳的“5.26”事件,于是,国人开始意识到球场观众暴力的严重性以及中国球迷群体的存在。

  时至今日,足球暴力事件越来越多。搜索一下网络上的相关报道,涉及到本赛季中超联赛斗殴场景的新闻标题就有:实德输球主队球迷被殴、金州上演足球暴力事件、重庆六连败引发骚乱、数百球迷围攻力帆俱乐部、图解连津斗殴全过程、天津大汉该出手时就出手。

  石岩统计,近年球迷闹事呈上升趋势。2000年7月15日,陕西国力队主场与成都五牛队踢平,赛后陕西近万名球迷不满比赛结果聚众闹事,最后防暴警察在国内首次使用催泪瓦斯和消防高压水枪平息了这次球迷闹事。这是职业联赛以来球迷闹事规模最大、性质最为严重的一起事件。

  中国足球流氓的趋势

  “国外的研究表明,足球暴力发展阶段在许多国家有惊人的一致性,很多国家最初阶段偶尔发生的足球暴力主要是由裁判员和运动员引发的。接下来第二阶段的足球暴力是发生在体育场内“敌对的”球迷团体与警察和安全官员间。第三个阶段是在体育场外这些团体暴力冲突的增加。近年来,我国足球职业联赛中观众暴力有由球场内向球场外蔓延的趋势。”

  石岩曾经在互联网发现一个“足球流氓天堂”网站,发表有《北京足球流氓章程》,在这份章程中对其会员提出必须熟练掌握“京骂”等要求。他认为,这可以说是第一个公开的中国足球流氓的非法民间组织。“中国足球流氓与国外足球流氓在扰乱球场秩序和社会秩序方面并没有区别。”石岩说。

  对付足球流氓用上高科技

  欧洲对足球流氓行为实行“零宽容”政策,现在利用高科技监控球迷流氓动态,对足球流氓实行登记备案制,对那些借足球比赛寻衅滋事的流氓给予坚决的打击,决不宽容。

  石岩认为,在管理球迷问题上既要允许球迷适度狂热,又要将其控制在一定的限度之内,在教育球迷文明看球上多想一些好办法,“在净化赛场环境、建立良好的比赛秩序和提供一个公平竞争的机会上,我们还有很多工作要做。”

  足球流氓溯源

  石岩介绍,所谓足球流氓(football Hooligan)的真正含义,是指那些到足球场并非是为了欣赏球赛,而是借看球之名发泄情绪和寻找刺激,他们往往故意制造事端,唯恐天下不乱,并以此为职业和精神追求。“这是足球流氓与球迷的根本区别。”英国是足球流氓的“发源地”。13世纪初,英国就出现了球场观众暴力现象

info in Chinese > 欧亚混血人种更具迷人魅力
2 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.18.2006 @ 9:26 pm

 

欧亚混血人种更具迷人魅力
◇字体:[ ]  发表评论 来源:法制晚报(06/01/16 13:24) 

  据英国《独立报》1月15日报道,科学家最新研究认为,混血人种,尤其是欧亚人种,具有基因优势,因而拥有更健康的身体,魅力也更大。

  一位研究人员说,这种研究结果证明了“我们的偏好也是进化而成的”。进化心理学家认为,这些研究发现反映出的不仅是身体美的偏好,还反映出欧亚人种或其他混血人种更健康。

  美国新墨西哥大学的专家索恩希尔也认为,基因多样化可以减少患病的几率

info in Chinese > 三大人种体能有差别 黄种人
4 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.18.2006 @ 9:23 pm

 

三大人种体能有差别 黄种人不适合踢球?
◇字体:[ ]  发表评论 来源:北京科技报(06/06/07 01:44) 

  黄、白、黑三大人种体能有差别———

  世界杯不带中国队玩儿。中国球迷很困惑:拥有13亿人口的大国,为什么找不出11个优秀的足球运动员,是否从遗传等人种学角度,中国人根本就不适合踢足球?

  东亚黄种人的足球天赋的确差?

  《中国体育报》资深足球记者周继明认为,很多人发出“中国人适合踢足球吗”这样的疑问,准确说是不太严谨的。但是从赛场的表现上来看,确实给人留下中国人天生不适合踢足球的印象。周继明说:“需要看清的一个事实是,东亚黄种人踢足球的天赋的确比黑人和白人要差。众所周知,正常的足球比赛时间是90分钟,而据香港报纸报道,香港足球比赛时间曾经有一段是70分钟,这完全就是根据体能天赋而设置的。”

  黑人,白人,黄人,谁的体能最差?

  周继明介绍说,欧美学术界对这个问题的研究已经有了一些结果。英国学者菲利普·拉什顿在1997年出版的一本名为《种族,演化及行为:生命历史的远景》的书里,详尽地论述了黑、白、黄三大人种在体力和智力天赋上不同的原因。

  他的研究表明,黑人的体力天赋最优秀,而黄种人在智力天赋的排列上是第一。这种天赋跟不同肤色妇女怀孕的长短有关。黑人妇女的平均怀孕时间为39个星期,白人妇女是40个星期,而黄种人妇女是41个星期左右。拉什顿认为妇女怀孕的最后时间被认为是用来发育大脑的,所以出生最早的黑人婴儿头部相对较小,而髋窄,最晚出生的黄种人婴儿头大而导致髋宽,头小的结果是智商发达程度不高,而髋窄的结果是跑跳更有利。除了髋窄外,黑人体力好的另外两个原因是,首先黑人血液中的荷尔蒙含量,比白人和黄种人高出约3%———19%,这就相当于黑人运动员终身服用了兴奋剂,其次,黑人婴儿一出生9个小时脖子就立得住,他们坐、站、走、跑的时间和肌肉、骨骼发育的时间和发达程度,也都比白人和黄种人要早,而血液中荷尔蒙含量低,婴儿期坐、站、走、跑的时间晚、肌肉骨骼不发达组成了黄种人体力差的全部原因。

  东亚人身体不如欧美人吗?

  体力天赋的差距在田径场上表现得明显。周继明说,足球最基本的要求是靠奔跑,但是从各项田径比赛中可以看出,黄种人明显不如黑人和白人,而且差距还非常大。尽管刘翔以12秒91的成绩获得110米栏比赛的奥运冠军,震惊全世界,但他的平跑速度很一般,因此刘翔的优势是技术,不足仍然是速度。

  另外在身体上的差距也是显而易见的。由于东亚黄种人的身高比较矮小,肌肉也不如白人和黑人发达,因此在力量上相对比较弱。周继明说:“1994年我赴美国现场采访世界杯时,当时德国对韩国的一场比赛给我留下很深的印象,在韩国队的禁区内,德国的克林斯曼可以非常从容地接球、转身,最后射门破网,而韩国的后卫只能跟在他的身后,根本不敢与其起‘正面冲突’。”

  足球考验综合能力,中国人注定玩儿不转?

  北京体育大学运动生理教研室主任熊开宇说,从生理学上讲,种族差异肯定是存在的,例如国足的平均身高在1米83左右,作为前锋的郝海东的身高是1米80,但是欧美有些国家的球队后卫的身高都在1米9左右,如果中国有这样身高的人被选为篮球运动员的可能性比较大。

  但是身高并不是踢好足球的绝对因素,像马拉多纳在身高上不占绝对优势,但是仍然能够成为最优秀的球星。熊开宇说,在所有体育项目中,足球对人类的体能要求最为全面,需要力量、速度、耐力、灵敏和柔韧这五大要素的综合配合。虽然黑人拥有最好的运动天赋,但是也有平衡能力差的弱点,而且在足球比赛中的配合默契不足,这也是为什么非洲球队难以夺冠的原因之一。

  熊开宇说,就单个要素来说,能达到优秀水平的运动员还是很多,比如举重、跳水和体操方面都是属于强项,但比较矛盾的是,力量大了,速度快了,灵敏性就差了。而足球需要讲究灵活性和协调性。尽管郝海东的速度比较快,但是就不如罗纳尔多灵敏,转身、起身要慢一些,而被称为中国最能跑的球员李铁,控球技术稍差,传球质量不稳定。所以想达到这五大要素全面提高,对于运动天赋较弱的中国人来说还是很困难的。

  后天弥补,中国足球还有救吗?

  熊开宇说,现在国足的球员基本上可以通过YOYO体能测试,这就说明,通过强制训练,中国球员的体能是可以提高的。

info in Chinese > 中国人是智商最高的人种?
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.18.2006 @ 9:17 pm

 

中国人是智商最高的人种?
◇字体:[ ]  发表评论 来源:北京科技报(06/04/05 01:35) 

  在收集研究了130个国家的智商测试后,最近,英国一位研究人种智商的学者得出了一个令亚洲人感到既惊讶又高兴的结论。他的研究结论是:中国人、日本人、朝鲜人是全世界最聪明的人,他们拥有全世界最高的智商,平均值为105,明显高于欧洲人和其他的人种。得出这一结论的专家是英国阿尔斯特大学名誉教授理查德·林恩。他的这一结论是否可信?又是如何得出的?几天前,本报记者通过电子邮件对理查德·林恩教授进行了独家采访。

  经过近30年和对130个国家的IQ测试,林恩教授得到不同地区人种智商的排名。

  林恩教授1977年开始进入人种智商这一领域的研究。他在信中说道,上世纪70年代,他注意到了日本的飞速发展,作为智商研究专家,他马上想到,日本能够有如此快的发展是否因为他们有较高的智商?于是,他开始了对日本人的智商测试调查。他发现,日本人的人均智商达到了105。得出这个结论后,他又猜想,中国人是否也应该拥有同样高的智商?调查测试的结果显示,他的想法是对的,中国人的平均智商也达到了105。

  中国、日本都属于蒙古人种,地域又很接近,于是,林恩教授开始了对人种智商差异的研究。在收集研究了130个国家的智商测试后,林恩教授总结出了不同地区人种智商的差异排位以及原因。

  东亚人(包括中国人、日本人、朝鲜人)拥有全世界最高的平均智商,平均值为105。而之后排位是欧洲人(100),爱斯基摩人(91),东南亚人(87),美洲本土印第安人(87),太平洋诸岛土著居民(85),南亚及北非人(84),撒哈拉非洲人(67),澳大利亚原著民(62)。而人种智商最低地区是南非沙漠高原的丛林人和刚果雨林地区的俾格米人,平均智商为54。

  林恩的这一研究遭到了西方社会的批评。他说,因为在西方有一个观点:所有人种的智商都是一样的,研究人种智商的差异被认为是种族歧视。

  通过研究,林恩认为,是恶劣的生存环境造就了高智商的人种。

  林恩教授对造成这一结论的原因也进行了研究。他认为,造成人种智商差异的原因是生存环境和基因。林恩教授首先注意到了加州大学研究脑量进化的专家杰里森的观点:在物种进化的过程中,物种的智力进化受到了环境的重要影响,也是物竞天择的一个重要因素。动物们要想在恶劣的环境中成为幸存者,必须进化出足够大的脑容量,这样它们通过视觉、听觉和嗅觉得到的信息才能在大脑中进行充分的分析。

  林恩教授认为,这一理论同样可以用到人类的进化中。在对诸多的数据分析后,林恩教授得出,寒冷的气候让人类得到了更大的脑容量。比如东亚人的平均脑容量为1416cc,欧洲人的脑容量为1367cc,而撒哈拉地区的非洲人脑容量为1282cc。林恩教授称,寒冷的气候让早期的人类必须学会如何御寒。在寸草不生,动物也很少出没的冬季,寻找食物努力生存下去使得这些地区的人类获得越来越高的智商,以求不被大自然淘汰。

  既然东亚人的智商最高,为什么西方人的发明创造更胜东方人?

  当林恩教授提出他的研究后,很多人提出了质疑。第一点就是虽然东亚人拥有高于欧洲及美国人的智商,但欧洲人在科学技术研究上要比东亚人更胜一筹,发明也更多。林恩教授认为这是由于东亚人在性格上比欧洲人更循规蹈矩,所以在发明创造上受到了一定的影响,但这并不能证明东亚人的智商低于欧洲人。

  林恩教授还提出,聪明的东亚人现在遍布了世界各地,包括新加坡、马来西亚、夏威夷、北美地区。而他们在各个科学领域的参与和成绩也越来越突出。

  爱斯基摩人生活在冰天雪地中,却为什么没有最高的智商?

  欧洲一些学者对林恩教授的结论的另一个质疑是,既然寒冷的气候让人类进化出最大的脑容量,并获得高智商,为什么生活在冰天雪地中的爱斯基摩人却是个例外。

  这一点,林恩教授用基因突变解释这个问题。林恩教授说,在早期非洲直立人向世界各地移民进化的过程中,他们带着能够进化出高智商和低智商的基因。而这种基因在人口发展快、人口多的地区得到进化的机会就更多。在寒冷的季节,低智商的人类逐渐被淘汰,而高智商的成为幸存者。

  爱斯基摩人的人口稀少,控制智商的基因突变成高智商的机会也就小于欧亚人。直到今天,爱斯基摩人的总人口也只有5.5万人
  中国人的高智商值如何得出?

  人种智商的测试及总结是一项非常复杂庞大的工程。在林恩教授的研究中,对130个国家的人的智商测试都来自各种专业的智商调查组织。比如对中国的人种智商测试,北京、上海、香港、西藏等地区的不同年龄段的人群都接受了标准化的智力测试调查。测试题包括儿童智力量表修订版及瑞文标准推理测试等。在进行了复杂的表格处理和计算后,得出了现在的结论。其中包括的数据有,上世纪90年代中期在上海进行的儿童智力量表的测试,得出的人均智商值为107,另外对一些14至15岁年龄段的青少年进行的其他几种智商测试题的智商值为103。另外还有通过瑞文标准推理测验(非文字智商测试题)对6到15岁的中国青少年进行的测试,平均分值为101,12到18岁平均分值为104,等等。

  ■知识小贴士什么是智商?如何测试?

  虽然我们经常使用智商一词来描述一个人的聪明程度,但恐怕很少有人能准确地说出这一词的含义以及如何测试。因此本报记者也请林恩教授为我们做了一个解释,林恩教授向我们提供了一些资料。

  智商(英文intelligence quotient,简称IQ)通俗地可以理解为智力,是指数字、空间、逻辑、词汇、创造、记忆等能力。要测量智力,最简单的方法就是给予一个测验,而测验里的问题很明显地要体现到以上能力的运用。

  1905年,法国心理学家比奈和教育家西蒙合作设计了世界上第一个智力测验。这些测验,每个都共30题,由浅入深,测试人的判断理解及逻辑等能力。这套测验,被当时的法国政府采用,用来测试学童的智力,以找出那些智力较低者,为其提供特殊教育服务。这个测验被命名为比奈-西蒙智力测量表,其后不断修正先前设计的测验。记者在对其他资料查寻后发现,20世纪20年代初及30年代,先后有中国的陆志伟和廖世承、陈鹤琴对此测试题进行了订正。

  在1916年,心理学家斯特恩提出一个“智商”的概念:如果一个小孩子的智力年龄与他的生理年龄一样,那么他的智力就是一般;但如他的智力年龄高于或低于他的生理年龄,则他的智力便是高于或低于一般水平。

info in Chinese > 1500万年后人类Y染色体可能消亡
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.18.2006 @ 9:13 pm

 

◇字体:[ ]  发表评论 来源:科技早报(06/08/10 14:38) 

  据澳大利亚媒体报道,澳大利亚国立大学的遗传学家詹妮·格雷夫斯教授表示,男性所特有的Y染色体正逐渐消亡,这将促使一种新人种诞生。
  过去几年里科学家一直在研究男性Y染色体消亡的问题。詹妮·格雷夫斯教授是世界Y染色体研究领域的顶尖科学家之一,而且她的观点颇为大胆。这次她的Y染色体消亡将导致新的人种出现的观点必将在科学界引起新的争论。

 
  詹妮·格雷夫斯教授一直研究有袋动物的性染色体,她将在今天在布里斯班举行的第11届国际遗传学大会上阐述她的观点。  
  詹妮·格雷夫斯教授的理论是,男性体内其他染色体的“决定男性特征”的基因将会逐渐取代Y染色体SPY基因的作用。SRY是Y染色体中决定男性特征的关键基因。SRY在胚胎的性分化过程中刺激原始性腺向睾丸方向发育,然后这个最初的睾丸就开始分泌雄激素,主要是睾丸素,刺激男性胚胎整个向男性化的方向发展:他的生殖器就要长成男性的阴茎,他的附性腺就要长成附睾、前列腺、精囊等。如果没有SRY这个基因刺激的话,原始性腺就会自然而然地向卵巢方向发育,然后卵巢分泌雌激素,刺激女性胚胎开始发育女性的性征,使女性的外生殖器、子宫、阴道、输卵管等发育起来。
  但是这意味着没有Y染色体的男性和有Y染色体的男性会分道扬镳,最终一种新的原始人种会出现。詹妮·格雷夫斯教授说,“新的人类原始物种很可能按照这种方式诞生。”
  两种人群会变成两种不同的物种
  詹妮·格雷夫斯教授说,失去Y染色体的男人大多数没有生育能力。但是一小部分能够繁衍后代,并把新的性别决定基因传给后代。这样就会出现两种不同的人群,而最终具有新基因的男人人群将会和有Y染色体的男人人群分开,进化成新的人种。“两种不同的人群的异性不能交配,于是他们逐渐变得不同,正如黑猩猩和人类从500万年前开始逐渐变得不同一样。当两种人群变成两种物种,他们之间被打入了某种楔子,他们就更加不可能交配了。这好像是绵延的山脉把两者分开。但是这是根本的差异,正如他们决定性别的方式已经完全不同了。”
  Y染色体完全消亡还有1500万年时间
  詹妮·格雷夫斯教授说,人类原始Y染色体的大部分基因都已失去。从3亿年前到现在,人类Y染色体的1438个基因已失去1393个。照此速度,再过1500万年,Y染色体将失去最后45个基因。
  詹妮·格雷夫斯教授认为,Y染色体之所以会消亡,主要是因为Y染色体是男性独有的染色体,每个男性的Y染色体都是完全从父亲一方继承的。这条形单影只的Y染色体不能像其他染色体那样通过与“同伴”染色体相互交换基因而维持自身的稳定存在。基因突变会累积,而变异基因最终会从Y染色体脱落,因为它们不再发挥作用。这导致在上万年的进化史中,Y染色体会不断失去基因,最终走向消亡。
  格雷夫斯说,Y染色体消亡的状况已经在一些鼠类身上出现,比如东欧鼹鼠和日本田鼠等一些啮齿类动物,就没有Y染色体和SRY基因。然而,仍旧有大量健康的雄性鼹鼠和田鼠在东欧和日本繁衍生殖。
  XX男性
  澳大利亚默多克儿童研究院的安德鲁-辛克莱教授目前正在对XX男性进行研究,所谓的XX男人就是体内没有Y染色体,这种现象每15万男性里面就会出下一例。
  辛克莱说,“这种现象说明存在取代Y染色体基因作用的新基因,只不过我们还没有发现。或者是在没有Y染色体的情况下,其他现存基因的“音量”被调高,发挥了更大的作用,所以XX男人具有男性特征。大约有10%的患有Y染色体缺失的男性有一小部分Y染色体附着在X染色体上,并携带睾丸决定基因。
  辛克莱认为格雷夫的Y染色体消亡将出现新的人种的说法只是“理论上可能”,而在现实中不会出现。“如果出现了没有Y染色体的男人,我不会把他们叫做新物种,而是把他们称为新的个体。”

Disgusting reports > Kuala Lumpur is cheapest city in the world says report
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.10.2006 @ 5:24 pm

Are you sure ?

The Star Online > Nation



Kuala Lumpur is cheapest city in the world says report

ZURICH: Kuala Lumpur is the cheapest city in the world to live in says a report compiled by Swiss bank UBS. 

Oslo and London are the world's most expensive cities, while Zurich and Geneva residents have the highest buying power, according to the report released on Wednesday.  

Europe dominates the list of 71 cities compiled by Swiss bank UBS, while Asian cities - including Kuala Lumpur, followed by Mumbai - are among the cheapest places to live, based on the cost of a basket of 122 goods and services. 

Oslo maintained its top position from 2005, while London rose three places to second.  

Copenhagen, Zurich and Tokyo round out the top five, with New York in seventh place globally.  

But London and New York are the most expensive cities when housing costs are included, said the 52-page report.  

"It's no wonder that their residents often tolerate extreme commutes in order to find affordable housing," it said.  

North American workers earn the highest wages, closely followed by Western Europe. 

But European net earnings are significantly lower because of higher taxes and social security contributions.  

Total pay packets were biggest in Copenhagen, Oslo and Zurich - but residents of the Nordic cities lose out when tax is taken into account.  

"After statutory deductions, people living in the Swiss cities, Dublin and Los Angeles have the most left over from their wages," said the report.  

London rose from 15th place to sixth in the gross wages ranking, but was only 20th in domestic purchasing power.  

Kuala Lumpur was the cheapest city, followed by Mumbai, Buenos Aires and Delhi. Delhi was also among the bottom five cities in both the wages and purchasing power rankings.  

Cities in eastern Europe and China were among the least expensive, while Asian cities have the longest working hours, with Seoul workers averaging 50.2 hours a week.  

Workers in Asia also have the fewest vacation days, on average 12 per year, compared to a global 20 days.  

"Western Europe, by contrast, is very attractive for employees who value their leisure time," the report added. - Reuters 

Latest from AP-Wire 

 

 



 

© 1995-2005 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)
Strictly Malaysia > What The Star’s role in Coliseum drama?
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.10.2006 @ 5:17 pm

 

What The Star’s role in Coliseum drama?
Alfredo Radzakov


The Star's anti-establishment itch is back again with the usual racial sentiment. The headline story on Aug 3 showed a distressed looking, old doctor crying foul over the government's planned acquisition of the Coliseum cinema in Kuala Lumpur. The picture being painted by The Star is that of a brutal government snatching away unfairly the beloved property of a poor, old man. 

The next day The Star published what the minister of culture, arts and heritage had already explained - that the building would be turned into a National Heritage Centre with the aim of making it a hub for artistic and cultural activities centring around the famous Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman. There was no mention of a plan to ‘tear down’ the building.

One wonders why The Star found it necessary to highlight the story of Dr Chua Seong Siew. One also wonders why Chua is so unhappy when his beloved building will become a national monument to be forever preserved and maintained by the government. Does he prefer the building to remain in his own hands so that he can eventually turn it into a money-spinner? Does the present status of the building as a cheap venue for movie-goers make it worthy of being recognised as part of our national heritage?

And worst of all, in order to drum up support for The Star's hidden agenda, it is publishing only dissenting views from the public. Surely there are people who would agree with the government's noble move. Isn't it the media's responsibility to present a balanced view to the public?

The purpose of this message is not to seek publicity but to call upon the good senses of the decision-makers in The Star to be more responsible citizens of this multi-racial, multi-religious and peaceful nation. The Star has a special role to play in this respect.

Needless to say, the English language has become the obvious medium of communication within the various ethnic groups and The Star has, by default, become the leading vehicle for such communication.

What the Chinese, Indian and Malay language dailies say reaches out mainly to their respective ethnic readers, but The Star cuts across all the ethnic groups. The Star cannot and should not, therefore, be seen to represent any particular ethnic group, even if it is owned directly or indirectly by a political party representing a particular ethnic community.


 

Do you have a viewpoint you want to share? Speak up! Send your 'Letters to the Editor' to editor@malaysiakini.com. Your letter may be published in Malaysiakini, and do let us know if you wish to remain anonymous.
Strictly Malaysia > Dr M’s quit call amusing
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.10.2006 @ 5:11 pm

Dr M’s quit call amusing
Sal


I think we should pity Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He is obviously suffering from withdrawal symptoms. After three years, he's thinking, ‘Oh no, I really am not the PM anymore. I need to be the PM again!’

Can't blame him, after all, 23 years is a long time to have been drunk on power. He can say what he wants now, that's for sure. He is completely within his rights to take potshots at the current PM. After all, I myself have been very frustrated by several decisions (not) taken by Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to restore democratic governance in this country.

But here's why I laugh at Mahathir's recent tirades. Democracy was destroyed in this country precisely because of Mahathir. I am in my mid-20s (definitely a child of the Mahathir era) and here are some of the juicier aspects of his career that need to be brought to the fore again:

1987: Mahathir used the ISA to arrest 106 activists, academics, artists, teachers, politicians and environmentalists for daring to have independent opinions, just as he claims to be doing himself right now.

1988: Mahathir single-handedly cut our judiciary at its knees by forcing the infamous amendment to Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution.

1997: Mahathir and his cronies led Malaysia into deep financial manure because of his policies

2001: Mahathir declared Malaysia an Islamic state, a further example of his disregard for the spirit and letter of our Federal Constitution.

Let's also not forget his oh-so-frequent attempts at muzzling the media, refusing publishing permits and even closing down prominent publications for daring to exercise ethical journalism.

Let's not forget that several of Mahathir's policies were catalysts for the growth of fascistic Ketuanan Melayu/Islam discourse. Let's not forget that it took Mahathir's administration 15 years before it even decided to pass any legislation on domestic violence, and he of all ministers was most vocal in attacking gay and lesbian Malaysians.

So yes, Dr M, I'm bloody frustrated with Pak Lah. I wish he'd get going on undoing all this misery that you, Dr. M, so cavalierly brought upon us during your 23 year reign. But, Dr M, I'm a much happier Malaysian now than I ever was during your administration.

So, from common citizen to common citizen, I hereby tell you that your call for Pak Lah to step down has as much meaning to me as a bicycle would to a fish.


 

Do you have a viewpoint you want to share? Speak up! Send your 'Letters to the Editor' to editor@malaysiakini.com. Your letter may be published in Malaysiakini, and do let us know if you wish to remain anonymous.
Strictly Malaysia > Open letter of sympathy to Dr M
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.10.2006 @ 5:08 pm

 

Open letter of sympathy to Dr M
Martin Jalleh


Dear Tun Dr Mahathir,

Like many Malaysians, I was very disturbed when I heard that someone had pepper-sprayed you. It made me think of the hundreds or thousands of Malaysians sprayed on with mace from the water cannons of the Royal Malaysian Police during your premiership and even till this day.

I was moved to tears when you said: ‘I felt my eyes stinging. I could not see clearly and had to remove my glasses.’ But this could be a blessing in disguise. You will now be able to empathise with those, who, like you, want to speak the truth but have to suffer a similar or more cruel consequence.

You were so right when you declared, ‘This is not the Malaysian way’. But you may not be accurate when you said: ‘We are a non-violent people.’ Remember how a former top cop had opened wide the door to violence with his near-lethal assault on the former deputy prime minister in the sanctuary of Bukit Aman?

Stories abound and some even suggest that the spray-incident was self-inflicted. I hope you will understand where these people are coming from. They are only seriously considering all possibilities just like you did, when you said the black eye injury suffered by Anwar Ibrahim was self-inflicted.

I was quite relieved when I read that the pepper spray was not intended for you. The incident was said to have been linked to rivalry between two groups of your supporters over who should chauffeur you to your hotel! I am sure you are quite used to this very useful ‘I-use-you-you-use- me’ culture.

And within hours of the attack you bounced back peppering the government with your snide remarks and sarcastic swipes. The powers-that-be found what you had served them, too pepper-hot to swallow. Soon after that, the information minister went into a delirium and a verbal diarrhea about controlling the Internet.

It was the best ever ‘wayang kulit’ in Kelantan - a recalcitrant retired PM speaking to political dinosaurs and moonstruck mullahs of a party badly mauled in the last elections and who, as Tengku Razaleigh has so rightly put it, are only preoccupied with their party’s survival than running Kelantan.

Never mind even if some have called your meeting at the hotel a political hotchpotch of has-beens, hoppers, and hypocrites. The fact that you had addressed a full-house in Kelantan who were all ears, was undoubtedly a miracle - one as great as the cow jumping over the moon.

Never mind if you have not kept your initial promise of not interfering in the government. (Not many of us expected you to, anyway). Your resolve to dig until (you) find the source of the worms and to persistently pepper the government with questions, has won the praise of some of the people.

In the midst of your new role to de-worm the government and to keep on churning out questions - whatever the answers - perhaps you could also find the time to attend to the increasing number of questions posed to you and which have wiggled their way out since your retirement?

Ani Arope, ex-chief of Tenaga, felt enlightened enough to blame you for the one-sided contracts awarded to the independent power producers (IPPs), with Tenaga being arm-twisted to accept onerous terms. Anwar Ibrahim has revealed that you were one of the key players in foreign exchange (forex) speculations resulting in losses of up to RM30 billion.

Tajuddin Ramli has alleged that you and Daim Zainuddin had directed him to sell back to the government MAS shares (resulting in a profit of RM1.8 billion) to help recover from the foreign exchange losses. As Proton’s advisor, I hope you have a copy of the PricewaterhouseCooper report on the mismanagement of Proton Holdings (1996-2005), which The Edge has called ‘Proton's Can of Worms’.

Your legacy is beginning to show, Tun - worms, warts and all. The chickens have come home to roost, but you refuse to allow anyone to ruffle your feathers. In spite of the increasingly evident flaws and failures of your 22-year-old government, you deem yourself worthy enough to label the present three-year-old government half-past-six. Alas, this contradiction is more stinging than a pepper spray.

You have complained that you have been deprived of the right to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association with others. You are scandalised by the muzzled press. But all these are a great part of your legacy Tun, and of which you are now a privileged beneficiary.

You were so right in saying that Pak Lah should not hide behind the OSA. You should know - 22 years of such a practice is more than enough. You need not worry at all about the possibility of being detained under the ISA. It is meant only for those bold enough to suffer for what they believe in.

I cannot help but wonder dear Tun, what would you do if the roles were reversed, ie, if you were the new PM and Pak Lah the former PM. Would you probably sack him from Umno or pronounce him a homosexual and drag him to court to make him irrelevant, or offer him a lucrative job overseas, say, in the UN?

When Pak Lah began as PM he had asked the nation to tell him the truth. Three years later the nation is asking him to tell the truth. When you retired you promised not to interfere. Now you insist that Pak Lah should resign. And both of you are slugging it out for the love of the nation!

Can there be a more exciting and entertaining moment than this? The citizens of Bolehland should just sit back and relax and watch the drama that continues in true Umno fashion - a script filled with tall tales, telling characters, threats, taunts and (political) thrills and spills and even tears. Please pass the salt and pepper!

 


 

Do you have a viewpoint you want to share? Speak up! Send your 'Letters to the Editor' to editor@malaysiakini.com. Your letter may be published in Malaysiakini, and do let us know if you wish to remain anonymous.
Strictly Malaysia > Banner of our sovereignty
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Aug.09.2006 @ 12:59 pm

 

The Star Online > Nation



Banner of our sovereignty

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian flag, which was first raised on Sept 16, 1963, originated from the flag of the Federation of Malaya. 

The original flag – with 11 red and white stripes and a yellow 11-point star beside a crescent moon against a dark blue backdrop – was hoisted at midnight on Aug 30, 1957 as the Union Jack, used under British rule, was lowered to signify the independence of the nation. 

The Council of Rulers adopted the design with some changes for the expanded federation when Malaysia was formed. 

The new flag had an additional three stripes and, likewise, the star was given 14 points – to reflect 14 states in the then Malaysia, which included Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore. 

Even after Singapore broke away from the federation in 1965, the design did not change, the number of stripes and star points remained. 

Today, the stripes and 14-point star represent the 13 states and the Federal Territory. 

In 2001, when Malaysians were invited to name the flag, then Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad picked Jalur Gemilang – or Stripes of Glory – to project the country's onward drive for continuous growth and success. 

Countries the world over hold a certain reverence for their national flag and this is just as true for Malaysia.  

History has it that the earliest use of a flag can be traced to 1122BC, when Emperor Chou in China used a white banner to represent his kingdom. 

This was stated in the book by Abdul Razak Ismail, Bendera, Banner, Lambang, Lagu Kebangsaan dan Lagu Kebesaran Negeri-Negeri di Malaysia, published by the Information Department. 

The word “flag” is believed to have originated from either an Old Saxon word flaken or German word fleogan, which means “to be raised in the air”. Today, the flag is a symbol of sovereignty of a territory.  

During the National Day celebrations, everyone is encouraged to fly the Jalur Gemilang at their homes, office buildings, shops and corporate premises. 

If the flag is fixed at home, it is to be raised pointing towards the road.  

If the flag is put in a group of flags with state and private company flags, the Malaysian flag must be raised in between two flags and its pole placed higher than the rest.

 



 

© 1995-2005 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)
<< < | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | > >>
Entries 101 to 110 of 213

   
| Report Member | Free Blog BlogText.org