A recent video in the BBC archives shows a woman giving a report about Building 7's collapse, even though directly behind her, on live TV, stands WTC7.

The release of this video has stirred up all kinds of uploaders to google video, youtube and articles like this one bringing the issue out and front.

Removed and deleted videos.

An article that links to the newly found video sites exposes the fraud of the 9/11 official story and with over 910 Diggs in 10 hours is not listed in the first 10 pages of digg. You should be able to find a link to the video from the article link here / here or in the digg comments for the entry.

Google pulled the video many times throughout today, YouTube has repeatedly removed the video.

Thinking about the BBC doing incorrect reporting comes to mind. But what you are witnessing is a BBC reporter that is talking about WTC7 having already collapsed, when it was still standing behind her.

There are many ways that you could come up with reasons as to how they could be so wrong as to report and discuss this false collapse between two reporters. But how?

When WTC1 and WTC2 fell there was no question. You either saw it or heard from someone who saw it or watched it.

Someone or her would have to write the report down, take in ideas from other people, discussed it maybe with her crew before she went on. She had to talk with someone with someone that knew it fell, otherwise why does she give the story. How could they not know?

At the end of my thinking, why does google remove the video, why does youtube remove the video? Why does digg keep this most dug story buried?

Censoring this video makes no sense. These makes google and youtube look like sell out.