It has been evident for a number of weeks now that talk show host Rosie O'Donnell has been trying to cover 9/11 truth in the best way she can without being yanked off the air - now her latest blog posting confirms this.

In her latest blog, dated March 15th, O'Donnell dispenses with the small talk and gets to the nub of the matter by stating some of the facts surrounding the demolition of building 7 on 9/11.

Here is the Blog entry in full:

at 5 30 pm
9 11 2001
wtc7 collapsed

for the third time in history
fire brought down a steel building
reducing it to rubble

hold on folks
here we go

• The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.
• Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”
• Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up”.
• The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.
• Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency’s major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. …”Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive,” said Max Berger of New York’s Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. “This is a disaster for these cases.” [New York Lawyer]

Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]

Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service’s largest field office with more than 200 employees. …”All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building,” according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

lets start here
ok…go slow
remember 2 breathe
use google

While the united states and allies look for resolutions (1)(2)against Iran, they miss the obvious hypocrisy they spread into the world.

By a treaty, Iran can legally enrich uranium to a certain point. Which they can do, in creating nuclear power plants for energy. Some people like to say that they have plenty of oil for energy? What about the green hoax of global warming, believed by some. A clean energy that is abundant and clean, why would anyone want to do that?!! How long has it been since the last time Iran invaded another country? It was in 1980 against Iraq. Ronald Reagan sold weapons to Iran during the war.

Most scientist conclude that Iran is 10 years out from manufacturing a nuclear bomb. There are three states that did not sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Those countries India, Pakistan and Israel who all have nuclear weapons.

I wish more countries liked starting wars like bush, then maybe they would not have to fund our enemies.

Who trained alqueda and the taliban in the Russian/ Afghanistan war? We trained them and then we used them as enemies to create more enemies. It is a perfect circle. Reminds me of a song. 

Reminds me of a time before 9/11, before every news outlet became a joke and part of the reason most people fear to know the truth. It is scary to realize that you do live in a dream land.

When it comes to fixed elections America leads the way. The times to where we have to choose between 2 evils for president could be over. If Ron Paul can win the republican nomination, our country could be saved.

Taken from this website are 10 reasons why Ron Paul can and should be the next president of the united states.

1. Total debt and unfunded liabilities in the US economy are reaching nearly 50 Trillion dollars for the public sector and another 30 Trillion for the private sector. Unless your family can pay it's million dollar share of the bill, it doesn't take a genius to see that the US is set up for an economic disaster in the next few years exactly like the one Ron Paul has been loudly warning about. 
2. Ron Paul is an experienced doctor and understands the needs of the medical industry as well as all the BS that drives up prices and causes costs to spiral out of control.
3. Ron Paul is a senior citizen, and understands the needs of the elderly, but also the fraud like ponzi scheme underlying the Social Security system.
4. Ron Paul is the 2nd highest rated congressman by taxpayer advocates.
5. Ron Paul is the highest rated congressman by technology groups.
6. Ron Paul has the support of many people who hate the war in Iraq because he voted against the Iraq War Resolution.
7. Ron Paul has the support of many who love the war in Iraq. Why? Even the most staunch advocates of the war realize that the US can no longer win this war on credit like we did against the old USSR. It must be based on a stable long term economic prosperity where printed up money can't over saturate society with bond backed debt or inflation. He is also an outspoken opponent of the UN, and they have back-stabbed US interests in Iraq many times.
8. Living in Texas, Ron Paul isn't clueless about immigration issues.
9. Ron Paul has the Libertarian vote locked up.
10. All of those are good reasons, but the main reason is that the powers that be in the US aren't stupid. When the US dollar suffers it's pre-destined currency-collapse/ great-depression, all the tried and true BS excuses won't fly. There will be trillions of dollars worth of pressure to do something about it, and all that pressure will take the political form of supporting Ron Paul who understands that the Federal Reserve is full of it, and that gold is money that can't be fraudulently watered down.

The US is not like other economies. When Argentina ruins their currency, investors just pull out and park it in the States, but when the things go to hell in the States there will be few options. Europe and Japan will go down with us because our economies are inter-connected; China, India, and Brazil don't have enough economic freedoms to support an exit strategy; and the rest of the world is either too small or too messed up to handle it. That means there is only one option, a trillion dollar fight to the death to kick Washington DC's ass and force them to get their act together. Ron Pauls position to kill the income tax, most Cabinet departments and the Federal Reserve is just the kind of ass kicking the doctor ordered. 

Secret prisons with secret tribunals, that is what a free and open democracy is all about. In news stories going around today, secret tribunals are being held in Guantanamo Bay. What makes this is odd is that two of the three being tried, are alleged to be planners of 9/11.

Todays date is March 13, 2007, 9/11 happen on September 11, 2001. I ask the gods, why oh why has it taken almost 6 years for these guys to be tried? How is this fair? This is what makes America look so stupid. The beacon of freedom, holds men for 5+ years for the largest attack on American soil, and yet our government takes this long to prosecute them.

Why has it taken so long? I shouldn't care because they are potential terrorist? No one has proved that yet. Not even the FBI. The FBI has no evidence that it was osama bin laden. Why has it taken so long? Because the official story of 9/11 is bullshit. Its a half baked farce.

Hitler and other dictators hold people in camps without being charged for crimes, for years and years on end. It is not how a democracy shows its freedom to the world. If the US government has proof these guys were behind 9/11 why can they not have these men in court like most free people, since this is the land of the free.

The problem is that this is not the land of the free. This is the land of keeping secrets long enough until the public forgets what the hell is going on. Our government wants its citizens to abide by the laws to sustain a functioning community of people. Why in the hell cant our government do just the same? Follow the laws that guide them and protect our freedoms.

George Bush and Dick Cheney deserve to sit in a cell for years without being told why and then they deserved to be tortured in the ways they have approved of their other fellow men. Maybe experiment with some oil-boarding. Same as waterboarding except we use crude oil. And after a secret citizen tribunal finds them guilty of treason, we don't kill them, we hand them over to the 9/11 widows, and they force the two to testify publicly about the events of 9/11.

It is time for a revolution.

The only place you will ever find Dick Cheney speak is in a controlled setting. Mainly because if you don't like george bush, you do not like the other part of his brain, that is dick cheney.

Dick Cheney is well known on the meet the press program for spreading lies about bush surveillance program. Dick cheney repeatedly tried to state mis information that there are still and were ties between Iraq and Bin Laden. In fact, there is a largely accepted tie to Bin Laden that relates directly to the United States government. Who funded the taliban aka Al Queda during the Afghan / Soviet Union War.

Norman Mineta, who can be seen in the video here or read here, testified before the 9/11 commission, that he witnessed Dick Cheney tell an aid, and that Cheney knew that there was a plane flying towards the pentagon and new of it when it was at least 50 miles out.

What protects the pentagon? The mother of all military complexes has no air defense? It only makes sense that the Pentagon, especially in the years after WWII and the rise of the Cold War would have had air defenses built in. There were reports over the years in the local papers about such missiles. One was also reportedly installed on the White House lawn following the incident in 1994 when a small plane crashed just before hitting the building.

I hope no one wants to argue shooting down a civilian plane or if they should let it fly into the pentagon. If you do wish to make that argument, how are we going to combat or respond to the terrorist attack or whatever kind of attack it is, if the pentagon is destroyed?

It makes no sense for officials to make the call that we are better off by letting the pentagon get hit with whatever is flying towards it.

Nobody Cares About The People

America has been fooled. The game is fixed and no politician really cares about you. If they did, they would be voting to protect your freedoms, not taking them away in the name of fighting terrorism. Politicians would be going by the constitution instead of keeping what they are doing secret, because if the terrorist find out, they will get us.

Getting into work and finding out that Richard is no longer around makes me sad. I remember watching Richard through most of his televised carrier. Anytime I ran across him on TV I would stop using the remote and listen to what he had to say. He was very funny. He will be missed.

I went to search google for more information about Richard. The first search result google game me was labeled his official site. I click on it to see what I could find. I ran into this link: http://www.google.com/interstitial?url=http://www.richardjeni.com/

Google thinks the official website of Richard Jeni may harm your computer. This is complete rubbish after seeing some of the cached versions google has of the website. Below I have linked to several google caches of Richards website. Non of which points in the direction of a harmful website.

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:WMtEAyF_mkoJ:www.richardjeni.com/+Richard+Jeni&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:1tGnJ3j9Lh0J:www.richardjeni.com/merchandise.htm+site:www.richardjeni.com+Richard+Jeni&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:RT-ZkMyJJ0kJ:www.richardjeni.com/biography.htm+site:www.richardjeni.com+Richard+Jeni&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:fER5O5vpLX4J:www.richardjeni.com/reviews.htm+site:www.richardjeni.com+Richard+Jeni&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us

Google needs to fix this error especially now and for the days to come. Millions who want to visit the official site through google will be confused and scared away from visiting the website. Google fix this error. There is no harmful content you morons.

For Richard.

The fact that Al Gore won an Oscar for a global warming documentary should make anyone with reasonable thinking that something be amiss, or over simplified, then maybe you should see some of the scientific numbers brought together by independent scientist around the world. Scientist whose numbers contradict human made global warming scheme are often ignored by the main stream or fired. Even the Co-Founder of Green Peace has left the organization after he became aware of updated scientific information. This information can be found in the video above.

Al Gore goes from Presidential candidate to winning an Oscar for a documentary full of propaganda that co2 from humans is causing a global warming. The earth's air is made up of 0.03%-0.06% co2. Volcano's produce more co2 a year than all the factories in the world combined.

Man made global warming is man made global spin for profit.

PCL XL error

Subsystem: kernel

Error: Illegal Tag

Operator: 0x1b

Position:6

Solution:

Re install drivers by going into printers and deleting the printer. Then go into the device manager and scan for new hardware. When the printer is found again it will reinstall the drivers and the printer will work again.

Updated - Re install the printer using the post script drivers. I found that worked as well. Good luck.

Jacob Lovell

Posted: 3/7/07

Allow me to tell you about a worthwhile man for the Presidency of the United States. He's an experienced Congressman from Texas, an important member of a major Congressional committee, and a gynecologist by trade. He has voted consistently against every single war supporting initiative, all the way back to Bill Clinton's "Iraq Liberation Act" that Bush has used to justify invading Iraq. He was a fierce opponent of the Bush Administration, even in the days after September 11th when so many other politicians kowtowed before the Almighty Executive. He has introduced legislation that calls for the decriminalization of non-drug hemp farming and other acts that cut funding for a plethora of government programs. He voted against all forms of the PATRIOT Act and has gone against his party so often that they can never rely on him for a vote unless the legislation in question is strictly Constitutional and ethical (which is rare, considering the party). This man has even stood his ground against the wave of "Support Our Troops!" propaganda, voting against every war bill even while being attacked for not "providing armor" to G.I.'s in Iraq and other such nonsense, becoming one of only four members in Congress to have voted against every war funding bill since the invasion of Iraq.

Who is this man? Is it Barak Obama, who has no experience as a statesman and wouldn't know Constitutional legislation if it slapped him? Is it Hillary Clinton, who suffers similar inabilities at obeying Federal Law and voted to invade Iraq? Perhaps it's Biden, Dodd, or one of the other no-name candidates that have filed to run as a Democrat in 2008 and have also proved themselves to be sheep in the face of a warmongering President? One way or another, such an anti-war candidate must surely be a Democrat, right?

Wrong.

The only person that is considering running in 2008 that has consistently been against the war and all unConstitutional Federal spending or actions is Representative Ron Paul, from Texas. Dr. Paul is, unfortunately for some, a Republican.

Simply because he has an (R) next to his name, some of you will not be voting for him. It's a shame, really. There isn't much one can write to beat away the mindlessness that affects those caught up in partisan politics. People who would write articles going on about the supposed victory that this country had in electing a majority Democrat Congress, and people who would revel in such an article, are not interested in solutions. These people do not care about principles in politics or ethics in law. Instead, just as in past elections where vast seas of mindless people voted for a party instead of a candidate, politics has boiled down to "I hope my side wins", with absolutely no regard to what their side stands for.

Partisan politics does not consist of Right vs. Wrong, Principled vs. Unprincipled, Ethical vs. Unethical, Constitutional vs. unConstitutional, or Wise vs. Unwise. Partisanship is simply Red vs. Blue, or with the state of politics consisting of Big Government Social Conservatives and Big Government Social Liberals, it's more like Red vs. a slightly different shade of Red. Worse, maybe it's more like Alien vs. Predator: Whoever wins, we lose.

The Democrat majority has done nothing to get us out of Iraq. No timetable has been set up and nothing has been done to curtail the out-of-control executive branch. The Democrats have fallen on their faces in front of political power instead of standing up for what is right (which is something they never actually promised to do, anyway). Pelosi's first 100 hours were a terrible joke, with absolutely no solid, Constitutional legislation coming out that would improve the condition of this nation. They have wasted their time and given up their check on power to build a bigger, stronger Federal government instead of cutting expenditures and reeling in the President. Truly, they are just another shade of Red.

Getting back to Dr. Paul's possible candidacy, I encourage each of you to do some research on him. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" House and Senate members on Capitol Hill. Do a search on YouTube.com for Ron Paul, and see if he isn't the most straightforward politician you've ever heard. Better yet, if you value action over rhetoric, look up his voting record and see his absolute dedication to principles in government. This man does not fall on his knees before special interest groups, corporate lobbyists, or partisan politics. Unlike any Democrat with a Presidential bid, Paul has nothing to apologize for - he did not vote, as Clinton, Edwards, and Kerry of the previous election had, to enter into Iraq or fund the occupation since.

Dr. Paul is running on the Republican ticket, but this man is not a Republican in the modern sense. Instead, he is a principled leader and fiscally responsible statesman. Unlike any other person that is considering a bid, he has a record of obeying the Constitution, being a true reformer, cutting Federal spending to support tax cuts for everyone (and not providing corporate welfare), being against the war in every single vote, and holding individual freedom as the only true goal for proper governance. If you want someone who has even just one of those qualities, Dr. Paul is simply the only option for 2008.

For the sake of this country, I beg you: Drop your partisanship mindset. Vote for principles, not party. Vote for Ron Paul in 2008.

In a story that is going around, about which comment was worse between colter commenting that john Edwards was a faggot or the comment by bill maher stating that he wished the bomb in Afghanistan would have hit cheney.

Coulter

Ann Coulter is best defined as a stupid bitch. All of the dumb shit Ann Coulter gets attention from is far right and equivalent to racism. Coulters comments about 9/11widows being money hungry is baseless. No one likes Ann Colter, even if they do, they either want her money or are desperate for sex. Seeing that Ann Colter is white and a female, she seems to have gotten away with calling John Edwards a fagot and she seemed to want to put out more names. When she makes the news, its over some extreme comment that has no basis for argument. Her words are meaningless unless you are in need of some political points.

Maher

Bill Maher i ok in book.  If Cheney was killed by that terrorist bomb, it would have be 9/11 all over again. Who knows what the dumb fucks in Washington would do if the #2 crook in power were to get knocked off by terrorist. More than likely bush would try to declare marshal law and create another federal agency with some cooler color codes to scare us for the day.

On a foot note if Bill Maher I recently watched this clip of bill maher. This was a good rant that gives background information to specific lies an outing of cia agents that were working to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.

Conclusion.

Neither comment addresses any issues that matter to America and yet draw all this attention. And those who can use these comments, presidential candidates, will use these terms to help fix America. Both of the comments supporting terrorist by supporting the enemy, letting them know we are weak and vulnerable.

Ann Coulter is a useless bitch and should be arrested for wasting air. Ann Coulter has just made herself to be a punching bag for both republicans and democrats. This makes Ann Coulter a political whore.

Bill Maher, yeah I know the thought of Cheney being blown up is nice, but there is evidence to put him in jail, do it the open way. Maher needs his paycheck so he will not be opposing the official story. I understand that but there is too much at stake.   

The Future

What will be the next war on? War on Iran? War on weapons of mass destruction? War on the Internets? War on the free liberties of the American People of the United States?

How about a war on fixed elections? War on million dollar campaigns? War on corrupt congressmen? War on privacy invasion? War on against phone tapping? War against tyranny? War against a banking system that is taking money away from the people?