the never ending space
Profile Blog Photos Subscribe Syndicate Search Contact Me  
Topics
9/11/2001
Bill Oreilly
bowling
deep thoughts
gaming
headlines
history
internet
jokes
Mike Filsaime
note to self
politics
quotes
reviews
Sports
tech
this just in
web
My Photos
Battlefield 1942
chads wedding
close ups
Company of Heroes
Cool Photos
family
Gaming
Guppy Troup Tribute
Katrina (hurricane)
Lord of the Rings
odds and ends
Pc Stuff
Pictures From Work
Richmond Flood
Signs
sky
Snowstorm 2009
test album
Wilfong Reunion 2005
Wilfong Reunion 2006
Windows Vista
Members
Sign In

Blog - Latest Entries
<< < | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | > >>
politics > US Ally Murders Iran Nuclear Physicist
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Feb.05.2007 @ 9:35 am

Israel or USA will start another illegal war with Iran. The latest news now comes from an assassination that many have said came about through an Israel agent.

Professor Ardashir Hosseinpour, a world authority on electromagnetism, was until recently working on uranium enrichment at the facility in Isfahan, one of the central processing sites in Iran's nuclear program.

The physicist died January 18, but news of his death only emerged six days later in two Iranian media outlets.

A report released this weekend in Stratfor.com stated that the Mossad was behind Hosseinpour's death.

The report said the physicist died from "radioactive poisoning" as part of a Mossad effort to halt the Iranian nuclear program through "secret operations."

While leaders of sovern nations are being removed by roge networks such as the United States and Isriel, it leaves one to wonder, what part of this war on terrorism, is legal?

The Iraq war from its basic thought is illegal. The entire Iraq fraud is about to spread to the rest of the middle east. So after America and Isriel have pissed off everyone in the middle east, yeah im sure there are some hard feelings towars Isriel and America.

It is not against the law for Iran to create a nuclear enegergy. We helped them start their nuclear facilities.

tech > IE 7 Flash Problem Fix
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Feb.03.2007 @ 10:56 pm

Recently flash movies and adobes website told me it could not detect flash. After reinstalling over and over and over again I came to the conclusion I needed to do something else. I could not delete the active x from Internet Explorer options. I even tried installing the flash 9 msi.

What did work was uninstalling the flash player using an unistall program provided by adobe. After uninstalling flash and reinstalling from the flash web install, I am once again able to view flash content.

IE 7 on windows xp is not that reliable.

politics > Will The US Go To War With Iran? Of Course
3 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.30.2007 @ 3:50 pm

War with Iran is inevitable. It will happen so long as George Bush and his neo cons are in office, and or while our government officials stand by and watch the unfolding of one of the greatest countries to ever inhabit the earth.

Why am I so sure of a conflict with Iran? The same people that told us Iraq was a imminent threat. The same people who told us they had weapons of mass destruction. The same people that told us they were linked to alqeda. The same people who have lied about the current war are saying the exact same thing about Iran.

And they are so sure of Iran threat, that they are considering dropping nuclear weapons on Iran, with no, none, zero, niltch proof of what they are claiming. It is the same old bullshit story for Iran just like Iraq.

If democracy is so great, seeing that we are killing in the name of and invading and occupying countries in the name of democracy, maybe our country, especially the assholes in charge of protecting our constitutional rights, would spend less time taking them away from us. How many of our rights is George Bush going to take away in order to fight a war on terror that the United States funded and trained in the first place?

Even US experts agree, if Iran was trying to development nuclear weapons, they would be 10 years out from having any kind of weapon. Iran has nothing to gain by starting a nuclear war. The entire world is watching Iran and from what we have learned in Iraq, even if we had a good reason to go to war, America will have to be willing to do Iraq all over again while we are still in Iraq.

It is insane that in this day in age our government and the crooks that represent it are using tactics dating back to the stone age, using fear to manipulate a publics opinion on political issues.

The only thing you hear from George Bush is fear, nuclear, terror, 9/11. Is the history of the world left to the ideas of George Bush? Will every president of the US lead our country down the road of fear? Will our government create more 9/11's to drive the will of fear into their systems?

9/11 Happened For A Reason.

If 9/11 is not an inside job, then why does the lease holder, Larry Silverstein, admit on PBS that he and some police and fire officials decided to pull building 7 at 5:30 P.M. on 9/11? Why is Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfawitz, Jeb Bush, Dan Quayle in a group of people talking about needing a Pearl Harbor like event one year before 9/11?   Why did the think group called Project for a New American Century call for a "Pearl Harbor(page 51)" like event to kick start their military spending and military dominance in the middle east one year before 9/11? Why, on the day of 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld asking people in the DOD to find information fast so that they hit Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein the same time?

The only hope for the United States is its people. Presidents, congressmen, governors, all of them ignore the lies of 9/11 and yet base their ideas and plans for the future of America around 9/11.

America, all of our public officers from the president to your local government officials are servants. They serve the people, what is in our interest. It is not in the interest of the United States to wage war over lies or create ideas about terrorist around lies. It is not in our interest to police the world.

If I was in the middle east, and knowing what America is doing with its military, I would resist against them at all cost.

Who is China to bomb America, come on our land and tell us what we are doing is wrong? What if china tried to invade us like we invaded Iraq? You would be pretty pissed off too right? A lot of people and countries do not like Bush. Does that give them the right to invade our country and tell us how best to run it?

The same people that fed us the lies about Iraq are saying the same things about Iran. I am not dying for this bullshit. Ask bush or cheney or someone in congress to send their kids to Iraq, surge in there and I don't know, kill some more people. Sounds like a great way to spread democracy. Don't talk, just shoot, till they are dead.

God bless America.

politics > You Can Not Blame Felons For Bad Laws
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.30.2007 @ 8:55 am

In a news article written yesterday, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/us/29florida.html?ref=us, the times describes how felons are getting guns because of loopholes, errors and miscommunication the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported Sunday.

Make no mistake, felons do not write laws. The legislators in florida write the laws. If there are problems with the laws, do something about it, instead of turning it into a loophole ordeal, get your Representatives to fix the problem.

Just yesterday an article came out in a Virginia paper that shows how adults in Virginia, when they are in their homes, can give children as young as 10 alcohol as long as they are supervised. Sounds like a loophole or double standard? If you feel that way call your Representative.

More than likely the law was put into play for a reason. When the newspaper got some of the names on the concealed-weapons permit list, shortly after lawmakers sealed it from public scrutiny last July. So the Florida government does not want anyone to know the names of the felons that now have concealed weapons permits. Wow, thats a step in the right direction against a global war on terror.

politics > state of the union 2007 notes
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.24.2007 @ 11:20 am

hilary stairs at bush with a dumb look.

john mccain winking to his left

healthcare - everyone stands and claps

private health insurance - is the executive officer this prioritized?

medical liability reform

open boarders for workers from mexico. they clapped. I cant believe they clapped when he said he wanted to open up the boarders. Dear God.

Nacy pelsiy stood up when he said immigration reform. Reform to opening the borders?

This is a joke.

Saving fuel in 10 or 20 years. This has been said before in other presidencies. Is this it, leave it up to bush to figure out how to reduce our dependence on oil?

Global climate changing. I bet he brings up 9/11 before its over.

Dick and bush drink water at the same time.

He brought up 9/11.

Global warming, terrorist, foriegn oil supply, dont forget 9/11, terror.

The world as changed. I feel it in the air. Once that once was is now lost.

Terror speech 9:37.

Hezbolla is mentioned. Hezbolah is compared to al queda. We funded and trained al queda. Hezbola is fighting Isreal who has defined UN law for many years.

9:40 - 9/11 again.

9:42 - john mccain is sleeping

talking about hezbola jepordizing an elected government. uh the iraq war, was just that dumb ass.

9:45 - iraq talk time. more troops. same as the speech he gave the other night.

chaos is our their greatest heaven.

he said 9/11 again, if we dont do the surge there will be another 9/11.

This war is 6 years old.

9:52 more terror talk.

He wasnts 90,000 additional military.

Iran nuclear weapons sanction from the UN.

What about the UN resolutions against Isreal?

What about bin laden?

Oh no another man that wants to go to cuba. Operation Northwoods.

Hunger poverty disease, africa aids. Is there more terror?

Mutumbo is in the house, bush called him son of the congo. Is that racist? 

God help us all.

tech > Windows Vista - Why You Should Not Upgrade
6 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.22.2007 @ 11:37 am | Lasted edited: Jan.22.2007 @ 2:36 pm

Windows Vista is on the edge of being forced down everyones throat. Whats new with this version of Windows? Marketing Money. People in marketing can learn to sell anything. Microsoft has enough resources to invest in how to sell products. The best way to sell something is to advertise the shit out of it.

Microsoft is spending billions of dollars on the marketing of Windows Vista when they really do not have to. No matter who you are, eventually you will have to upgrade to windows vista.

Recently I found and article talking about the what Vista offers that XP does not. Lets go into that.

1. Added Security
Parental Control: There are a number of software applications available nowadays that allow parents to keep a tab on their kids' Internet activity.
Vista packs this feature in the OS itself. The feature called Parental Control, which is not present in the Windows XP, will allow parents to control their children's PC activities without a fuss. In fact, parents will be delighted with Vista's ability to block objectionable content.
The controls will allow them to act as a computer administrator and set specific boundaries for other users, including separate standard user accounts for family members, especially children. They can set rules like which sites a certain user can, or cannot, access and hours during which a particular user can use the computer.
They can also curtail access to specific applications and view where other users have been on the computer and on the Web.
Response. How many times do we see Microsoft bundling software to manage something that they don't need to manage. Haven't we learned enough from IE, Media Player, Windows Firewall, or Windows Defender? You know I remember windows 95, 98se, millennium, 2000, and all of those systems said they were more secure, question is more secure than what, the last Microsoft operating system?
2. User Account Control (UAC)
UAC is a new security feature that allows users to operate Windows Vista more as a standard user than as a true administrator, where one has complete access to everything. Features that UAC protects, denoted with a multi-coloured shield, require their permission or validation before they can be accessed.

This is a feature that windows should do without question. To say it is a security feature is too broad, of course its security, what isn't? It has already been documented by many it professionals that people should not operate there machines as a true admin. The color shield is like the Homeland security threat level. I mean, if I click on something and it says access denied, I do not have access, what about people that are color blind?

3. Windows Firewall
Vista features two different firewalls: the standard firewall that was available in Windows XP and Windows Firewall with advanced features. The latter offers true firewall protection, including bi-directional filters, meaning that both incoming and outgoing data is scanned before being let out.

Lets be clear that the XP firewall is almost useless when users find out it only supports blocking communications one way. I am sure a simple patch/upgrade could fix the windows xp firewall to function more like any firewall, maybe that would be to much to ask. Not to mention the amount of problems I run into relating to windows firewall even though it is disabled. When Microsoft bundles in software to the OS, it makes a dandy of a time for other software to work correctly. Not to worry, all the software you will ever need will come pre built into vista, whether you like it or not.

4. Windows Defender
Formerly known as Microsoft AntiSpyware, Windows Defender is the built-in spyware blocker bundled in Windows Vista. Windows Defender (already available for past many months as a free standalone application to the Windows Genuine users) is an improved version of Microsoft AntiSpyware, and sports a simpler interface and very rapid access to scanning.

Did we just go over this? In history who has better cleaned and defended windows? Any company other than Microsoft. Off the top of my head there are two free spyware removal programs I can think of that are better than this corporate trash, SpyBot and Ad-Aware. Windows Defender is ok, however anything integrated into the OS like this is not good practice for anyone.

5. Booting process
The NT Boot Loader present in XP has been replaced by Windows Boot Manager. Vista does not allow storing users' own as well as application files in Windows installed boot drives such as C drive for security reasons, for users, including the administrator.
Does this matter to anyone? Is this the type of update that requires new hardware, no? Is this the type of update that convinces me into buying Windows Vista? Is this a breakthrough?

6. Windows Aero
There is a new feature called Aero which is enabled for use if the system contains a high graphics card that can support DirectX 9.0 and higher. This feature, which again is not present in Windows XP, enables one to view the open windows as 3D windows. The task bar and open windows can be given translucent or semi-transparent effect.

At all the conferences for windows vista I went to everyone went crazy for the new Aero in windows. Any feature that Aero offers, windows xp can do with 3rd party software. If you are trying to make alt-tab do pretty functions as to tile tabbing windows or if you want to make windows transparent.  Vista supports direct x 9? Uh doesn't xp? So xp doesn't use all of direct 9 like Vista, and I have to upgrade to get that functionality? Give me a break. The translucent or transparent effects matter nothing to IT because it has nothing to do with anything other than one of Microsoft's main marketing points. You want me to buy new hardware and upgrade my operating system so that it is more pretty?

7.Windows Sidebar
Vista brings a sidebar similar to the sidebar in MS-Office 97. Programmes can be quickly accessed, through customizable buttons provided for the purpose. One need not navigate through Start > Programmes > Programme Group > Programme Name to run a programme. Instead, one can create a short cut on the side bar such that Programme Name can be directly accessed.

The panel displays the user's selection of Windows applications such as a clock, a calendar, Outlook inbox and currency exchange.

A sidebar is a feature? Google gadgets is one of many software programs that allow a windows slide bar. The reason Microsoft is throwing this on the desktop and calling it Microsoft is because the market is full of these types of programs. Apples mac has had a bar like this for some time, and even Microsoft knows that sidebars were available in office 97. What a breakthrough, Vista is a dream mode for windows XP.

8. Windows Search

One of the most helpful new features in Windows Vista, is the new, vastly improved search for files or applications from almost anywhere. Unlike in Windows XP, with Window Search, you can simply type a few letters of your search request, and the results appear on the fly — a very helpful feature when looking for a file or application from the Start menu. Google watch your Desktop!

To put into contrast how good Microsoft's search has been, Google, yahoo, and every major portal has made a desktop search for windows systems. Even the desktop search created by Microsoft is worse than the default search feature built into windows XP. Who made the decision at Microsoft to allow a dog to be a search assistant? One good thing about vista is that I was told the dog search assistance is gone, outa here, fired. If Vista has a search function built into that actually works, then yeah that would be a new feature. Pay for the upgrade and find out.

9. Enhanced User Experience Start menu : Microsoft has redesigned the desktop items, such as the start menu. The taskbar, which consists of the start button, is similar in look to the Windows XP Start button. However, the default colour of the task bar has been changed. Instead of classic blue, the colour has been changed to coffee black. The Start menu displays everything within the context of a single menu. Instead of having to scroll through a list of applications, which took up considerable screen real estate in Windows XP, users can now view a single, collapsible Start menu. Improved folders :
My Documents, My Music, My Videos, and other icons have been simplified and now appear simply as Documents, Music, Videos etc. These folders are always present when one searches folders.
Live Icons : When Windows Aero starts, users can hover their mouse over open windows in the taskbar and see a live representation of what's running in them. They can get the same preview by using the Windows Flip 3D feature or even by pressing ALT+TAB to toggle windows and folders, which makes navigation much smoother.

Also, the icons appearing on the desktop have been made larger compared to Windows XP. Microsoft has done away with word "My" in the terms such as My Computer, My Document, in Windows Vista.

To describe the user enhancements by describing the start bar color change is a huge let down. Who cares about the color, can I change it? The start bar is the same however in Vista it is easier to view and does not take up a lot of screen, WOW. Improved folders, are improved because they are and thats what it says, and the prefix "my" has been taken out of the My Computer and My Documents. This change is a improvement to folders because folders load faster with less letters. Live icons feature can duplicated by downloading 3rd party windows software.

Vista in Summary

Is this what we have to look forward to? Big companies shoving crap down the pipeline? Is vista worth he upgrade? Yeah if you are mainly worried about how pretty your desktop looks. Windows Vista reminds me of Apple/Mac OS.

What does Vista offer the home user? More security? More functionality? Didn't windows 95 say that at install too? When you give Microsoft $200 and or upgrade your system to run Windows Vista, what are you getting in return? The chance to play Halo? Which brings up a good point as to why Microsoft should not make games. The requirement for Halo 3 is that you are running windows vista. Thanks Microsoft, you make open source more likable every operating system.

Windows Vista in reality is a mod from Microsoft to make windows XP more secure and everything else they said about Vista. Vista is just more money for Microsoft and dell, and the rest of coporate world who also run drug money for the CIA.

9/11 was an inside job. www.wtc7.net

tech > IE 7 Super Bug - Microsoft, Why?
2 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.17.2007 @ 4:20 pm | Lasted edited: Jan.17.2007 @ 4:00 pm

At first it may have seemed that Internet Explorer 7 was going to separate itself from the rest of the operating system. Seeing that security is important to Microsoft and terrorism, it would be a great idea for Microsoft to split the two.

What I have found out about IE7 is that Microsoft is just a group of people, people are flawed by nature and yet IE7 is supposed to be more secure. Bite me Microsoft.

At the time of writing this entry IE7 has been out on windows update for several weeks.

When I was running a defrag recently I noticed some files that were in a folder called C:\documents and settings\bill\local settings\temporary internet files\content.ie5\somelargeyoutubevideo.flv

Seeing that it was a temp file, I wanted to delete it on my own. I browsed to the temporary internet folder to find no such folder content.ie5. I thought I had the path wrong so I triple checked it. I was right, it was hidden.

I always view hidden files and folders. Anyone that remembers every windows and IE version, you could always browse to your temporary internet files and delete them yourself.

Until ie7 any user could do this. Now IE7's temporary internet files located in the folder content.ie5,(why the hell do they label the temp folder for IE7, IE5), is considered a hidden protected system file.

The super bug is that on most xp pro service pack 2 machines, even if you view hidden files and folders and unhide protected operating system files you still can not see the Content.IE5 folder. On top of that using internet explorers delete temporary internet files from within IE7 still does not remove the file.

Are you kidding me? In an information age when viruses and spyware download and store themselves in the temp internet folders, advanced users can not view much less remove those files. It was not until I downloaded a program called PurgeIE, was I able to delete IE7's hidden temporary internet files and folders.

If this is the type of software the entire world has to look forward too, Microsoft can kiss my ass.

Microsoft has at least one patch a week or more that fixes security flaws in windows and IE. To summorize all of those descriptions of the security flaws throught Microsofts history, "There is a security risk with your software that allows remote users to execute bad code on your operating system."

Patch after patch after patch after service pack after operating system. Do you remember the install screens for windows 95 - XP? Didn't they all read something along the lines of, more secure, better pc experience, get more done faster, easy to use, blah blah blah.

The same old shit for ten or more years just for microsoft to downplay a new security vulerability found in the unreleased version of microsofts new ball of problems Vista.

tech > Files required to use Microsoft Update are no longer registered or installed on your computer
2 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.17.2007 @ 4:07 pm

Once again Microsoft shows me some error I have never seen. While trying to run windows update on a Windows XP Pro service pack 2 system, I got an error message that stated:

Files required to use Microsoft Update are no longer registered or installed on your computer.

Microsoft gives you two options, 1 register or download and install files. That option is recommended. Option 2 asks users to click it to help find a fix. Option 2 is pointless, the link takes you to a detailed search form that is blank. This helps you none in finding an aswere to microsofts problem.

There are several fixes you may try to resolve your problem.

Fix 1.

Re-registering the various dll files that Windows Update requires to run. To do this click on the “Start” button then “Run” and enter the following command into the “Run” dialog box: regsvr32 wuapi.dll

You should recieve a message that the command was successful. Repeat the step above for the following files:

regsvr32 wups.dll

regsvr32 wuaueng.dll

regsvr32 wucltui.dll

regsvr32 atl.dll

regsvr32 msxml3.dll

Fix 2

If that fix does not work try to reinstall the Update Agent. This link takes you to the Microsoft Download for the update agent.

If you run the Update Agent and get a message telling you it is already installed do the following: Click Start > Run and type "WindowsUpdateAgent20-x86.exe /wuforce" without quotes.

politics > Iraq's Freedom - Did They Take Ours
0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.16.2007 @ 4:13 pm | Lasted edited: Jan.16.2007 @ 8:25 pm

The United States has dedicated the entire country to spreading democracy and freedom throughout the world. Well, mainly it is mainly Bush's Regime, anyway, we are spending billions of dollars and more important, our soldiers lives to install our way of life on the Iraq people.

Constitution for a reason

The idea behind our country was by the people and for the people. The main job of the president is to uphold the constitution. Also in the constitution it details out that Congress, not the president, is to declare war. Why? Who would you prefer start a war, one single person deciding what is best for a country, or all of the members of the Congress get together and discuss the situation. Being a republic and not a dictatorship, allows a group of individuals with different ideas to come to the decision(congress), should we go to war?

Did congress declare the Iraq war? No, Bush asked congress to create legislation to give him the power to declare war himself. The weapons of mass destruction inspectors were kicked out of Iraq even when they had still not found any weapons of mass destruction. With the republican party congress we recently sent home, it was easy for Bush to get them to pass a bill. Just like reasons for the Vietnam War, the Tonkin Resolution, was a bill of paper that gave LBJ the power to start the Vietnam war. The Tonkin attack was a lie to get the Vietnam war started, just like the imminent threat of weapons of mass destructions.

Could Iraq be free like the USA?

The one big flaw in Bush's idea of peace, by way of complete war, George Bush and his administration with cooperation from our Congress has removed many of our liberties/freedoms guaranteed in our constitution.

While civilians and US soldiers die for Iraq freedom/democracy, here is what our President is doing for our democracy and freedom in our own country:

After 9/11 rather than seek the truth, Bush: (1) reversed the presumptions governing Freedom of Information Act requests; (2) pushed through the USA Patriot Act allowing secret "sneak and peek" search warrants, secret "national security letters," and electronic search warrants without probable cause;" (3) authorized eavesdropping on American's international telephone and e-mail communications; (4) authorized military surveillance of American citizens; (5) signed secret directives allowing prisoners, including American citizens, to be held without trial or access to attorneys and to be tortured; (6) commenced building secret "detention" centers in the U.S.; (7) secretly kidnapped foreign nationals and confined them in secret prisons around the world; and (8) defied the will of Congress by making more than a hundred "signing statements," which nullified legislation without a veto.

What is freedom/democracy?

Is freedom a word used when instigating a fight or war? Will there be a never ending battle until the world accepts Americas terms for freedom and democracy? How can a nation, who takes its own peoples freedom away, wage war on nations who do not grant or adhere to the same cultures or laws we are custom to?

Is it fare to the USA to say, "Hey since you are not like America, you should be invaded and straightened out?"

Do you want to talk about reality? Do you want to talk about a New World Order? A global police state? Does everything seem like it is getting worse? Our politicians are more corrupt and complacent with crimes and cover ups. Even our own president defies the laws of the country in which he swore and oath to protect. Treason. That is punishable by death.

The truth is that our government was created to keep rich people rich. The game is being played on a fixed board.

George Bush is Hitler. To figure this out replace Hitler with George Bush and replace the Jews with Muslims. Over 650,000 Iraq's have been killed since the war started. Think about that.

politics > Proof George Bush Is A Dictator
1 Comments / Subscribe To Comments
Posted: Jan.13.2007 @ 12:38 pm | Lasted edited: Jan.13.2007 @ 12:04 pm

This Sunday on 60 Minutes, George Bush gives his first interview after the troop surge crap speech. When asked if he has the authority to send these troops without the approval of congress, he says that he does and that he has already made his decision and he is going forward. Click here to watch the clip from the interview.

If our congress does not do something with George Bush, he will single handedly start a war with Iran and Syria and Iraq. I will not go to war and fight for this asshole. George Bush knows nothing, nothing, about fighting a war, nor does he know how to surround himself with intelligent people. George Bush is the worst person to not be elected and sit in the oval office.

The 2000 election was fixed in a state where his brother and campaign manger made the calls on the recount. He did not win the popular vote from Americans in 2000.

There never was a link with 9/11 and Iraq and yet 6 years after, the biggest inside job since Kennedy's assassination, Bush prick face throws 9/11 around like a winning card hand to get support to go to world war 3.

Fuck you George Bush, this country hates you. Do you think killing 654,965 Iraq's since the invasion compares to the number of people Saddam was hung for? You dumb shit.

<< < | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | > >>
Entries 81 to 90 of 449

   
| Report Member | Free Blog BlogText.org