|
| <<
< |
1
2
3
| >
>>
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Nov.14.2006 @ 4:12 pm
|
No we can not.
A lot of people and politicians in America are worried about gay rights and gay marriage. Since when was being gay illegal? If the Christian groups want to talk about effects of gay marriage and how it shatters all of humanity, then maybe we should remind them of the divorce rate? In 1999, the last year the federal government collected such statistics, the divorce rate was right at 50%.
Not to mention, the simple fact that straight (not gay) parents, have gay offspring. If you want to blame gay marriage on anyone, blame it on the parents who where married when decided to have kids.
I do not know a statistic, but I hope that all parents, of gay people, support them through their life as a human being.
Isn't there something in the bible about judging people. Doesn't it come down to the Gods judgment?
The United States is in Iraq nation building trying to get that country to get along by way of killing one another. Sounds like it might make sense to a three year old. And yet here in America certain groups of people are fighting for their freedom that is guaranteed in the Constitution, oh yeah, unless you happen to be gay. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Sep.26.2006 @ 4:28 pm
| Last edited: Oct.01.2006 @ 2:28 am |
For those of you who believe in conspiracy's, you might often hear from others that conspiracy documentaries and media of that sort ask their viewers to draw their own conclusions. Many non conspiracy thinkers believe that a "conspiracy theory" involves telling the viewer to draw their own conclusions and in that is the theory, the person thinking about what actually has taken place. I completely understand that the given information in that presentation might lead to only one direction of thought almost insisting that the user think this way.
While this could be true, a rejection to information is still rejection. However the basic principle still exist. People were given the mind to think, those that think people should not draw their own conclusions, usually have a specific agenda of their own.
One person that comes to mind, who dislikes con piracy theories, even though they are conspiracy, and not just a theory, is George Bush. Right after 9/11 when George Bush went to the UN to give a speech. Watch that clip here.
I don't see how any true conspiracy can not start out by being a conspiracy theory. The theory part means that it is in the works. Ideas are forming and evidence is building towards a hypothesis. This first process has to start out as a thought. To figure out anything, people have to use their minds. So why when someone is thinking about a conspiracy, or presenting information about this idea, can the person viewing the information not draw their own conclusion? It makes sense to me to present the information, ask someone how they view the information and compare. Do they draw the same conclusion or something different. From that point and other information, theories evolve into than just thoughts, but reasons, and answerers to the why question.
George Bush a man who has screwed up everything he has ever touched, asks people to draw their own conclusions on a top secret report that was leaked. The report deals with a study that shows the Iraq war has created more terrorist and has not made America safer or safe. However the entire report will not be declassified. Bush said he has ordered Director of National Security John Negroponte to declassify the report's key findings .
"He'll do so in such a way that we'll be able to protect sources and methods ... that our intelligence community uses," Bush said, "and then everybody can draw their own conclusions about what the report says."
This means George Bush wants American people to draw their own conclusion on a report that has hand picked key findings by a member of George Bush's administration in a report that says the opposite of the Presidents rhetoric, that being the Iraq war has made America safer.
"It will stop all the speculation, all the politics about somebody saying something about Iraq; you know, somebody trying to confuse the American people about the nature of this enemy," Bush said.
Dear America, George Bush does not want people to be confused about the Iraq war. Seeing that it has been proved Iraq was no were near capable of being an imminent threat, no weapons of mass destruction or no weapons program since the 1990's and yet he starts a war much like Vietnam and he, the executive commander and chief does not want to create any confusion?
This is simple double talk. Look up double talk and find out that if we do not wake up soon, America will fall, not because of its people or terrorist, but because those who swear to protect us are slowly selling our freedoms for war and tyranny. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Sep.07.2006 @ 12:04 am
|
Katie Couric interviewed George Bush who said catching bin Laden still matters. This completely contradicts when recently the CIA disbanded a group that specifically went after Osama bin Laden. What does that tell you? Does Katie ask why that group was disbanded? Does she question the president. God forbid someone question a C student from Yale who avoids war and avoids drugs while in the military.
George Bush and most news agencies are jokes. Katie has proved that her move to the evening news mattered nothing about the news, only the hype that she got a new job. Who cares. End the war. 9/11 was a inside job. Wake up. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.16.2006 @ 2:28 pm
| Last edited: Jun.20.2006 @ 5:49 pm |
Religion talks about the mark of the beast and the one world government and so do conspiracy theorist. Is there a relation? A one world government that thinks it has the worlds answerers and all the worlds power. Sounds like the USA right? Thats exactly what is happening.
The Project for a New American Century is a think tank of people who wish to dominate the world. Who openly supports the thoughts and ideas of the Project for a New American Century? To name a few Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Do any of these names ring a bell?
Want to see their website? With their names endorsing the idea of mass world wars and mass USA oppression on the rest of the world? Follow this link.
We need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
Don't forget America, 9/11 was an inside job. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.12.2006 @ 2:46 pm
| Last edited: Jun.12.2006 @ 1:58 pm |
It's and old saying that pretty much sums of the life of mankind since the beginning. "History repeats itself". Yes it does and when it repeats, all the more lives are lost. I will preface my next entry with this entry. If this is the first time you have read one of my entries, good luck, if not, you already understand how I feel about the government and its puppets.
Recently I have been crying out like many have that the real 9/11 murderers are within the government. An attack like this could not be performed by a guy in a cave with box cutters. And for some reason, Americans can not understand or think on the level that, yeah the government would do something like this and yes they have a lot to gain by causing fear and war.
Ask anyone you know, or run into. Ask them if they think the JFK assassination was accomplished by a lone gunman or a conspiracy. On a poll of the United States two thirds of the USA citizens believe that the JFK murder was a conspiracy. That is a lot of people. But even though the majority thinks he was killed by something other than what the Warren Commission concluded, their beliefs go uncared for by the government. If the people are the power of this country, why after 40 years do our cares and demands go unanswered? To tell you the truth, the government can not tell you what was behind the JFK assassination.
What I can tell you is this. You can go to any JFK website that says it wasn't a conspiracy and you can read all of the "facts" they have and the eye witnesses reports they have gathered. Nothing any of those websites can explain the video below.
The Secret Service Stand Down:The video requires google video and the flash player. In this video you see a secret security agent being waved off of the presidents car. When he is waved off and told not to run along side the car, he throws his hands up in the air. It is easy to make out he is confused about why he is not following along with the president.
Conclusion: No one has to be in the military or secret service nor do they have to be a rocket scientist to figure this video out. Like many of the documents of the JFK assassination; this video was held by the government for a long time. Answerer this, if Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gun man who killed Kennedy, how did Lee Harvey Oswald get the secret service to stand off of the presidents car?
History Repeats Itself With Help: What is really scary to think about, since Lee Harvey Oswald was not acting alone and the country as a people think that there was a conspiracy, how do you get the media, history books, and the government to say 40 years after the fact, that there is no proof of a conspiracy at all?
Did Lee Harvey Oswald have the power to tell Peter Jennings 40 years after the murder to run a special called "The Kennedy Assassination – Beyond Conspiracy".
Other than seeing the video above, another piece of common sense evidence that the JFK assassination was a conspiracy is that the Warren Commission (group of people LBJ put together to investigate JFK's murder) concluded that the fatal shot to the head of JFK came from behind JFK. The zapruder film shows that when Kennedy's is truck by the fatal bullet, his body is thrown back and to the left. How does a man who gets shot in the head from behind get thrown back and to the left? Doesn't sound right does it? The government had experts say many things as to why his body went in the direction it did after being struck by the bullet, but none of it makes sense.
What the government has said about the assassination of JFK does not make sense and the reason why is because it did not happen that way the government said. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jun.01.2006 @ 11:09 am
|
Why do companies make commercial advertisements that take an actual video, then process it with some software to make it look like a cartoon? I believe its a bank commercial or an investiment commercial of somekind.
Either draw a cartoon and voice over it or show the actual video. This commercials need to be removed from the air waves. |
|
| 6 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Apr.23.2006 @ 6:49 am
| Last edited: Apr.23.2006 @ 6:04 am |
Corporate banks are slimy and always looking for a way to tweak their bottom line. Wachovia is no exception. Wachovia has the approach to their customers, "We'll kick you while you're down".
When I used my check card and there is no money in my account, the transaction doesn't go through, there is an insufficient funds error. But for some things and unknown reasons, Wachovia will time to time charge a $30 fee multiple times when a transaction request funds from an insufficient account.
What doesn't make sense is that the $30 fee does nothing for you, its really Wachovia saying, hey you didn't have any money so here is a $30 fee to remind you. At first i thought wachovia charged me the fee because they went ahead and paid the transaction and charged $30 for getting the money. That is not the case. Wachovia does absolutely nothing for this $30 fee. There was also a miscellaneous $10 on day along with other $30 fees. All through this while I had deposited a check recently that was thirty minutes after the deadline. God forbid the bank, herder of all money, not get a day off for presidents day or some holiday that only banks are known to get off for.
Wachovia was rated #1 in customer service by the firm they hired to compare them to other companies. Get away from Wachovia, bad people are bad people. Wachovia sucks. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Apr.20.2006 @ 12:58 pm
| Last edited: Apr.20.2006 @ 9:51 am |
We are all furious, gas prices are on the up and up and our pay rates stay the same. If its not a natural disaster, its a corn based petroleum additive causing gas prices to go up. Its real convenient when the busiest travel time of the season is about to hit full throttle. We the people can stick it to the gas companies and cost them millions.
The summer time is an easy way for gas companies to make a lot of money off of the working people who need fossil fuels to go to work, go to school, or to the gas stations to get more gas.
I have an idea that will rock the gas company world. Its very simple and is not the normal idea you would expect to read. Here is the idea.
Every time you use your visa, master card, credit card or check card, each transaction costs them money. That transaction fee is called an interchange fee. No matter what the charge, the gas station has to pay this fee. So say you buy $10 worth of gas, exxon or shell might have to pay visa, an interchange fee of 10 cents for the transaction or a certain fixed percentage rate. Last year, according to the National Retailing Federation, card issuers made some $25 billion on the interchange fee alone.
The idea is simple. Go to exxon, shell or whatever gas company you choose and use your debit card. Buy $.01 cent worth of gas and hang up the gas pump. Complete the transaction and repeat that step. When you buy that one cent of gas, it cost more than once cent for the interchange fee. So really what you are doing is making them pay something like fifteen cents for a one cent gas purchased.
If people started doing this, in a matter of days something drastic would happen. More than likely someone would make a law that makes it illegal to do, however that would only come too late. In less than a few days of doing this around the country it would cost the gas stations millions if not hundreds of millions.
The government of the united states wants to regulate everything, however they do not regulate gas companies. You've seen it before, gas prices can changes several times a day. Nothing else I know of changes as quick or as often as gas. And for some reason the government wants to do nothing about regulating how the gas companies screw us working people over every time they want to make a profit. And I'm sick of it.
The one cent trick, tell a friend. |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Apr.11.2006 @ 4:59 am
| Last edited: Apr.11.2006 @ 6:06 am |
Windows, you got to love it. Stats show that the chances that you are running windows are 9 out of 10. One thing that bugs the crap out of me is when I am wanting to shutdown windows or do a simple restart, most often than not, some program wont shut down.
Windows knows I am trying to shut down or restart the machine. How do they know? Because I clicked the button to shutdown / restart. So why oh why doesnt windows end now for me? I am in the process of shutting down, when else would I want to end this task, tomorrow? Maybe wait untill I leave the room and then end it so I dont have to watch the brutal ending of a program that needs to die so I can get on with rebooting.
For Ron |
|
| 0 Comments / Subscribe To Comments |
| Published: Jan.26.2006 @ 11:30 pm
| Last edited: Feb.23.2006 @ 12:16 pm |
Early on in the movie meet the parents Greg is going to meet Pam at her kindergarten class to purpose. What may not be obvious to everyone is that she knew he was going to purpose to her and knowing that, in her case, she needs her fathers permission, she guides him along the path he needs to follow to get him to where he is trying to go. Like gandalf in lord of the rings who guides frodo to mordor.
The two main thoughts are that one, she answers the phone and when he says something to her about her kids in the class she ignores him like he didn't say anything. When does a teacher not key in on the words your kids when she has left them unattended across the street? She either doesn't care about kids or she is trying to avoid seeing the letters the kids have held up against the window. How did the kids hide the letter signs from her all day without her knowing they had them?
Point two is that I'm sure that most women could have sensed that he was acting weird and being extraordinarily nice to her. If anyone knows about getting married, its the women who hear the stories from the other women, how they pass down stories of where and how they were purposed to.
The kids first notice him and draw her to his attention. He happens to be across the street while other people are walking around and they pick him out. He makes her cross the street to meet him. He tells her that he got off work early and was nearby. Then says he wants to get something to eat. She cant leave the kids there and go have lunch right then.
In summary:
She gets the idea hes going to ask her to get married. They cant get married without CIA dads approval. "I cant believe he knew to ask dads permission." |
|
|
|