The illusion of being free is a great prison for the minds of the weak.

-Me

unless someone can prove someone else said it.

The driver of a gasoline tanker that overturned early Sunday, sparking a fire that destroyed a vital highway interchange near downtown Oakland, has a criminal record, including a two-year prison sentence for drug possession, the authorities said Tuesday.

Lets be clear the people that hold public offices, that sit in our congress, that run our country all of which have been convicted of greater crimes that this guy. The media will try to turn this into another war on drugs. Just like they turned the VT incident into a fucking circus and now gun idiots controls are going to save the armless.

What really effects our country is the bullshit leaders who lie and cheat their way into office.

Jul 30, 2002

The Associated Press

Since the 1970s, more than a dozen congressmen have been convicted in criminal court. Their cases and sentences include:

- Rep. Andrew J. Hinshaw, R-Calif., spent a year in jail after being convicted in 1976 of accepting bribes when he was county tax assessor. He lost the primary election and resigned at the end of his term.

- Rep. Charles Diggs Jr., D-Mich., was convicted in 1978 of operating a payroll kickback scheme in his congressional office. He served seven months of a three-year prison term. He was re-elected, then resigned in 1980.

- Rep. Michael Myers, D-Pa., served 20 1/2 months of a three-year prison sentence for accepting bribes from FBI agents impersonating Arab businessmen. He was convicted in 1980 and expelled from Congress.

- Rep. Mario Biaggi, D-N.Y., was convicted in 1988 of extorting nearly $2 million from defense contractor Wedtech Corp. He resigned from Congress and served two years and two months of an eight-year sentence. He was defeated for re-election in 1992.

- Rep. Mel Reynolds, D-Ill., was sentenced in 1995 to five years in prison for having sex with an underage campaign worker. He resigned from Congress, then was sentenced in 1997 to 6 1/2 years for bank fraud and other violations. The second sentence, which was to run at the same time as first, was commuted in 2001 by President Clinton.

- Rep. Walter Tucker III, D-Calif., was sentenced in 1996 to two years and three months in prison for accepting and demanding bribes while mayor of a Los Angeles suburb. He resigned from Congress a week after his 1995 conviction.

- Rep. Dan Rostenkowski, D-Ill., pleaded guilty in 1996 to two felony mail fraud charges, lost re-election and served 15 months in prison. Clinton pardoned him in 2000.

AP-ES-07-30-02 2230EDT

For the last 18 days Governor jon corzine has been on the news because he was in a car accident. Corzin was sitting in the passenger seat when his vehicle crashed while it as doing 90mph.

1. Why is he in the passenger seat?
2. What was the hurry?
3. *Was anyone charged with a crime? Maybe reckless driving? (update)
4. Does anyone know that he bought his way into the senate?

*Corzine asks for a seatbelt ticket and paid $46 for the fine. Why does he have to ask for a ticket?

No one should care about corzines or his well being, he is a dumb ass and natural selection would have taken care of this if we let it.

First off he is a dumb ass one for not wearing his seat belt. But what I dislike about him more is how he bought his way into the political office. If anything his stupidity should shine the light on how he got elected.

Corzine Shame to Fame

Corzine has only been in the political spectrum since the year 2000. He was elected to the senate in 2000 with a 4% win margin. spent $62,802,999 of his own money on his campaign, the most expensive Senate campaign in U.S. history — over $35 million of this was spent on the primary election alone, where he ran against former Governor James Florio.

Who needs 60,000,000+ to win an election? A crook? A guy who knows nothing about the senate? A guy who enforces seat belt laws, and yet has not been charged with failure to wear a seat belt.

Corzine works for free. He opted not to take a salary. Uh. rich people who don't need money, do not need to be running our country. I am not sorry, this is a stupid man to be in a position as Governor.

Apology rejected. Quit your job and go back to counting money. There is no use for you.

A sudden withdrawal of US troops from Iraq would be an "unforgivable mistake" that could spread chaos across the Middle East, President George W. Bush warned Tuesday.

And george bush has what to backup that anything he says is not a lie? The liars of all liars again repeats what he always does to make people feel bad about not supporting his lies.

Mr Bush on Tuesday renewed his promise to veto the bill because of its inclusion of withdrawal dates, which, he said, would "embolden our enemies and confirm their belief that America is weak".

America is weak because it is not in the streets protesting this illegal ass war of lies. America is weak because its president is a dictator. America is weak because george bush is a fucking idiot who has no background that qualifies him to be president, the executive officer of the military. America is weak, mainly because of the military industrial complex that has taken over as the main employer for American people. America is weak because george bush stole the election and never gave it back. America is weak because the people entrusted to protect it, sold it out many years ago. Hey bush, fuck you.

George Bush is a dictator. The United States of America has a separation of powers so that one fucking idiot can not ruin an entire country. Yet Bush is still on his way to doing just that.

You see dumb ass (george bush) when people do not like what you are doing, or are tired of your lies, they go against all the bullshit you have been saying. Meaning that just because you think you know that pulling out of iraq is a bad idea, seeing that all of your ideas a dumb as fuck, pulling out against your will sounds like a good thing.

I can not get over the times. We live in a time where the president, vice president, and the dumb fucks they have around them, are willing to break any law to further their cause of taking American values and replacing them with federal reserve notes. George Bush wants to control every aspect of our government. So far since he stole the 2000 election, he has been one of the most obvious examples of what happens to a country when very bad people take over.

Would you like to support the troops? Bring them home now, bring them home alive, so they can share the real stories of the shit the news never reports and lies they are forced to cover up.

Fuck you george bush, you too dick, and that goes for all of you other traitors who will sell American soldiers lives for profits in your companies.

Who started the Iraq war lie? The same rich pricks who sit on the board of directors of the large energy companies, media companies and banks. The richest people in the world sit on board of directors for banks, the news/media, and oil companies. There is where you find the root of all evil.

I can not buy what I want because it is free.

Google just bought doubleclick. Doubleclick is one of the main reasons why 9 out of 10 machines have spyware. I wrote about this a while back here.

Do you remember surfing the web back in the late 90's early 2000, and you would go to a website and an advertisment would try to install some type of software. Over and over and over it would try to install it. And even if you installed the software, it would continue to ask you to install it over and over and over again?

That was doubleclick. Money is the root of all evil. It also elects the president of the united states.

Some report that terrorist are smarter than most give credit for. George Bush thinks that terrorist will not be able to find there way to the USA if we stay in Iraq. You know how he spits it, "If we don't fight them where they live, we will have to fight them where we live."

9/11 was a lie, that is why they had to get rid of Imus. They really want Rosie to stop talking about 9/11 on the view, they sure wish they could get her fired soon.

When the founding fathers made free speech part of the bill of rights, it was not intended to protect news programs from talking about celebrity hair cuts. It was intended to protect those who do not hear and repeat everything they hear on the news. It was intended for free minds to express themselves and have it as a given right.

This country was founded on the principle of being able to speak out against your government when you believe they are not doing something that is right.Sometimes this involves issues that some people find hard to discuss. Unfortunately no matter how painful it is to discuss, it is apart of evolution, going on, finding whats wrong and fixing it. Just because some people can not handle the discussion, does not mean that the situation is not discussed.

Everyone who survived 9/11 is a victim too. We have all been told by our government that we were attacked by people who don't like our freedoms and want to destroy our way of life. Since 9/11 the real threat to our way of life has come by restrictions on our inalienable rights to freedom. Those restriction came from our government. Not the terrorist. You can not blame terrorist for our government taking our freedoms away.

Since 9/11 the border is the same and instead of trying to find bin laden, they go to war with Iraq over a bunch of lies.

They don't care about bin laden. Bin laden is better off to them alive. A scare tactic.

Freedom of speech is not for the weak minds who think inside a box. Free speech is in the constitution and until it is removed you can kiss my ass.

Secret prisons with secret tribunals, that is what a free and open democracy is all about. In news stories going around today, secret tribunals are being held in Guantanamo Bay. What makes this is odd is that two of the three being tried, are alleged to be planners of 9/11.

Todays date is March 13, 2007, 9/11 happen on September 11, 2001. I ask the gods, why oh why has it taken almost 6 years for these guys to be tried? How is this fair? This is what makes America look so stupid. The beacon of freedom, holds men for 5+ years for the largest attack on American soil, and yet our government takes this long to prosecute them.

Why has it taken so long? I shouldn't care because they are potential terrorist? No one has proved that yet. Not even the FBI. The FBI has no evidence that it was osama bin laden. Why has it taken so long? Because the official story of 9/11 is bullshit. Its a half baked farce.

Hitler and other dictators hold people in camps without being charged for crimes, for years and years on end. It is not how a democracy shows its freedom to the world. If the US government has proof these guys were behind 9/11 why can they not have these men in court like most free people, since this is the land of the free.

The problem is that this is not the land of the free. This is the land of keeping secrets long enough until the public forgets what the hell is going on. Our government wants its citizens to abide by the laws to sustain a functioning community of people. Why in the hell cant our government do just the same? Follow the laws that guide them and protect our freedoms.

George Bush and Dick Cheney deserve to sit in a cell for years without being told why and then they deserved to be tortured in the ways they have approved of their other fellow men. Maybe experiment with some oil-boarding. Same as waterboarding except we use crude oil. And after a secret citizen tribunal finds them guilty of treason, we don't kill them, we hand them over to the 9/11 widows, and they force the two to testify publicly about the events of 9/11.

It is time for a revolution.

-By Ron Paul for President

The Pentagon recently reported that it now spends roughly $8.4 billion per month waging the war in Iraq, while the additional cost of our engagement in Afghanistan brings the monthly total to a staggering $10 billion.  Since 2001, Congress has spent more than $500 billion on specific appropriations for Iraq.  This sum is not reflected in official budget and deficit projections.  Congress has funded the war by passing a series of so-called "supplemental" spending bills, which are passed outside of the normal appropriations process and thus deemed off-budget.

This is fundamentally dishonest: if we're going to have a war, let's face the costs-- both human and economic-- squarely.  Congress has no business hiding the costs of war through accounting tricks.

As the war in Iraq surges forward, and the administration ponders military action against Iran, it's important to ask ourselves an overlooked question:  Can we really afford it?  If every American taxpayer had to submit an extra five or ten thousand dollars to the IRS this April to pay for the war, I'm quite certain it would end very quickly.  The problem is that government finances war by borrowing and printing money, rather than presenting a bill directly in the form of higher taxes.  When the costs are obscured, the question of whether any war is worth it becomes distorted.

Congress and the Federal Reserve Bank have a cozy, unspoken arrangement that makes war easier to finance.  Congress has an insatiable appetite for new spending, but raising taxes is politically unpopular.  The Federal Reserve, however, is happy to accommodate deficit spending by creating new money through the Treasury Department.  In exchange, Congress leaves the Fed alone to operate free of pesky oversight and free of political scrutiny.  Monetary policy is utterly ignored in Washington, even though the Federal Reserve system is a creation of Congress.

The result of this arrangement is inflation.  And inflation finances war.

Economist Lawrence Parks has explained how the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 made possible our involvement in World War I.  Without the ability to create new money, the federal government never could have afforded the enormous mobilization of men and material.  Prior to that, American wars were financed through taxes and borrowing, both of which have limits.  But government printing presses, at least in theory, have no limits.  That's why the money supply has nearly tripled just since 1990.

For perspective, consider our ongoing military commitment in Korea. In Korea alone, U.S. taxpayers have spent $1 trillion in today's dollars over 55 years.  What do we have to show for it?  North Korea is a belligerent adversary armed with nuclear weapons, while South Korea is at best ambivalent about our role as their protector.  The stalemate stretches on with no end in sight, as the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the men who fought in Korea give little thought to what was gained or lost.  The Korean conflict should serve as a cautionary tale against the open-ended military occupation of any region. 

The $500 billion we've officially spent in Iraq is an enormous sum, but the real total is much higher, hidden within the Defense Department and foreign aid budgets.  As we build permanent military bases and a $1 billion embassy in Iraq, we need to keep asking whether it's really worth it.  Congress should at least fund the war in an honest way so the American people can judge for themselves.

The traitor who started the latest Real Id Act, says that it will help fight terrorism, mainly because they say that the 9/11 hi jackers had valid drivers licenses. And now the so called terrorist are going to cost american tax payers $11 billion dollars to implament the real id act.

As of now six states have passed legislation that are in direct opposition to the act. Among these states are Maine, New Mexico, Washington, Wyoming, Montana and Georgia.

Georgia Senator Mitch Seabaugh introduced Senate Bill 5, which states that the exact requirements of the Real ID Act have yet to be defined, and several deadlines ranging from November of 2005 to January of 2007 have passed with no requirements established.

In addition to this, the bill states that the Real ID Act was tacked to the end of a spending bill for defense and tsunami relief, allowing it to slip through without careful examination. Without taking a closer look at the bill, some fear that this will leave documents more vulnerable to counterfeiting and citizens more susceptible to identity theft.

Well at face value, if you believe the lie called the 9/11 commission report, and believe that the 19 hi jackers are responsible for 9/11, would you not find it interesting that 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia. Even bin laden himself is from Saudi Arabia. But Bin laden happened to hiding in a cave in the same country we wanted to invade before 9/11.

Oh thats right we haven't found osama bin laden yet. He is not important. bush never said he wanted him dead or alive. bush just uses the bin laden name and word terrorist to start other wars that he relates somehow to the terrorist he has yet to hunt down or show evidence of their involvment in 9/11.

Hackers have already cloned the RFID in the Real ID chips and used them for other purposes. Meaning that your Real ID card, has a radio frequency device in it. It gives out an electrical signal that is unique all its own. Kind of like your social security number. The problem them is that armature hackers have already found a way to clone and duplicate the RFID signal in Real ID cards, making it so that they could impersinate anyone by simply hacking a technology the federal government has no idea on how it works or the vulnerabilities the technology has. All congress knows is that they have a bunch of lobbyist or bribist giving them money and things to pass this bullshit National ID card down to the states and force something unconstitutional.

If the states do not stop this national id card sham, welcome in the era of show me you papers all over again. If you do not know about the Real ID Act, you better go find out all you can, then tell your congressman to get the lobbyist out of his ass and act like an american.

Real ID will not stop terrorism.
How can you stop or wage a war against terrorism.
Terrorism is not a physical entity, it is a belief.
I could get a real ID card and the next day decide to be a terrorist.
This is a way to monitor those INSIDE the country.